AZDoug Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 Why were there two sear catches in teh bottom of the 1921/28 bolt? I have pondered this for some years (off and on, I really do have other things to do) :-) And have come to the following conclusion: The rear (stock end) most catch is for general manual cocking so the bolt doesn't have to be pulled all the way back, and the front most catch is for the first chance to stop multiple discharge after the trigger is released, the then the rear catch acts as a safety catch for either bounces off the buffer the for underpowered ammo. Does anyone have the real story? BTW: You guys that hate NAC guns so much remind me of a family reunion at the DuPonts when all of a sudden some mixed race orphan shows up and claims she is heir to the fortune. http://www.machinegunbooks.com/forums/invboard1_1_2/upload/html/emoticons/laugh.gif Doug Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Fliegenheimer Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 Doug, I think you have hatred confused with incredulity. When Philip Fetcher creates a myth about NAC Thompsons' to justify a $20K to $25K projected JC Devine auction price, the uninitiated collector might drink that Kool-ade before taking a closer inspection. As far as the hillbilly relative reference, it seems Fetcher is trying to stake a claim for the entire inheritance before the demise of the patriarch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZDoug Posted February 3, 2004 Author Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 Hey, what fun is it if I can't pull y'alls strings about NAC guns. http://www.machinegunbooks.com/forums/invboard1_1_2/upload/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif I know nobody here hates them, they are just the red-headed step child of the family. I am curious if anybody has the exact why and wherefore of the two sear catches on the bottom of the bolt. Another question or two: Did the original Colt 1928 buffer pilots have the little hole at the front so a pin could be inserted to keep the spring compressed over the pilot during reassembly, or is that a WWII introduction? Doug Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
21 smoker Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 AZDoug,...all the 28 buffer pins I have seen have the hole... I thought the 2nd sear slot was on Brit proofed stuff...only guessing on that.out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The1930sRust Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 QUOTE (PK. @ Jan 19 2004, 10:24 PM) There are two notches in either the 21/28 or M1/A1 bolts (towards the front of the rectangular body) which will hold the bolt in the cocked position, one a little further back than the other. The “first†notch catches the bolt in the rear most position. The “second†notch is about 5/8†back of the first and will allow the bolt to be that much further forward when cocked. It’s purpose is to catch the sear if the first notch misses it in semi auto fire. The third notch in the M1/A1 bolt (towards the rear of the bolt) allows the sear to raise up so the safety can be engaged with the bolt closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mp40 Posted February 4, 2004 Report Share Posted February 4, 2004 Guys, Not having a Thompson here in my hands to check it out, but..Does the bolt face clear the top round in the magazine before the sear catches the first or second notch? if it does, perhaps, it might act as a safety in the case of cold wet hands actuating the bolt, slipping just after the bolt face clears the round in the magazine... Accidental discharge time....Could this be the case? I know that this is the case in many other open-bolt firing designs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Jr Posted February 4, 2004 Report Share Posted February 4, 2004 I dont give a nac! http://www.machinegunbooks.com/forums/invboard1_1_2/upload/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif Mine shoots from both positions. Who knows why its there, PK's answer is probably about a close as your going to get. Call Doug Richardson, I bet he knows more than I do. Jr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PK. Posted February 4, 2004 Report Share Posted February 4, 2004 The sear would have to engage the bolt prior to the bolt face engaging the top rd in the magazine in order to prevent an accidental discharge as you describe. This is not the case with the Thompson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now