LIONHART Posted May 15, 2004 Report Share Posted May 15, 2004 Say, has anyone seen the new Kahr Arms ad in American Rifleman, page 41? "OWN A PIECE OF AMERICAN HISTORY! Auto-Ordnance: Original manufacture of the world famous "Tommy Gun" Well, that sums up the debate on what is/is not an original Thompson in my mind! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Fliegenheimer Posted May 15, 2004 Report Share Posted May 15, 2004 So much for truth in advertising! The only piece of American History the Kahr buyer posesses is that they bought a firearm that holds the U.S. record for being sent back to the manufacturer for repairs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waffen Und Bier Posted May 15, 2004 Report Share Posted May 15, 2004 The current Auto Ordnance is no more the manufacturer of the original Tommy gun any more than the current ArmaLite is the manufacturer of the original AR10. They ain't. In fact, the original Auto Ordnance wasn't even the manufacturer of the original Tommy gun. That was Colt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Fliegenheimer Posted May 15, 2004 Report Share Posted May 15, 2004 W&F, Actually Auto-Ord did build the prototypes sans Colt. But of course Kahr's reference to the Auto-Ord that they are associated with only extends back to 1975 when WH manufactured their version of the Thompson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt Posted May 15, 2004 Report Share Posted May 15, 2004 Guns are tools of death and without death, how can we know life? Guns are tools of death and without death, how can we know life? Guns are tools of death and without death, how can we know life? Guns are tools of death and without death, how can we know life? Are you getting sleepy? Now you will mail Sgt all your Thompsons. http://www.machinegunbooks.com/forums/invboard1_1_2/upload/html/emoticons/ph34r.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gijive Posted May 15, 2004 Report Share Posted May 15, 2004 Waffen Und Bier, Recommended reading would be, "The Gun That Made the Twenties Roar", by Bill Helmer. Auto-Ordnance did indeed design, build prototypes, research, refine and ultimely contract with Colt's to build the first Thompson submachine guns. Auto-Ordnance did retain all the rights and patents to the gun, even though Colt's built them. The Auto-Ordnance Corporation of today has no definitive lineage to the original Auto-Ordnance Corporation that designed and manufactured the gun and the arguments about the legitimacy of the current company wont be repeated here. Colt's has no claim to the gun other than being the first contractor to manufacture them in any quantity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deputy 89C6 Posted May 15, 2004 Report Share Posted May 15, 2004 Nothing is as it was in the past..."Miroku" now builds the "Gun that won the west" but they still say "Winchester" Same goes for the Browning. Kind of like the city of Cleveland retaing the rights to the history, and team name of the Browns when they moved to Baltimore....but in that case the "reproduction" is at least as good as the original. Steve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TommyGunner Posted May 15, 2004 Report Share Posted May 15, 2004 Did anyone catch the part about the "oustanding workmanship" http://www.machinegunbooks.com/forums/invboard1_1_2/upload/html/emoticons/laugh.gif http://www.machinegunbooks.com/forums/invboard1_1_2/upload/html/emoticons/laugh.gif http://www.machinegunbooks.com/forums/invboard1_1_2/upload/html/emoticons/laugh.gif that goes into them? Damon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waffen Und Bier Posted May 15, 2004 Report Share Posted May 15, 2004 Okay, okay. If you want to count prototypes, then that would be Auto Ordnance Corp. That's what I meant. Yeah, that's it. That's the ticket...... http://www.machinegunbooks.com/forums/invboard1_1_2/upload/html/emoticons/wink.gif How's that? I was just trying to point out that they just bought a name, but everyone here knows that. http://www.machinegunbooks.com/forums/invboard1_1_2/upload/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimFromFL Posted May 15, 2004 Report Share Posted May 15, 2004 There sure is a lot to laugh about, but the funniest is the price. http://www.machinegunbooks.com/forums/invboard1_1_2/upload/html/emoticons/rolleyes.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deputy 89C6 Posted May 16, 2004 Report Share Posted May 16, 2004 PhilOhio, Not running down Miroku...I have several Winchesters & Brownings made by them. Just trying to point out that sometimes the only thing that doesn't change is the name. Unfortunately, the Kahr seems to be on the other end of the scale. BTW...I was completely ignorant to the problems inherent with the Kahr Thompsons. To think I was shooting my 1927A1 in complete bliss, totaly unaware of the potential problems lurking beneath the surface. Once educated I began to fret accordingly and sent it off to PK. Man...I might have gone on shooting it for years and not have known what a liability I had there...but then I started reading about the Kahr Tommy's reputation here...lucky for me! Steve BTW...the last paragraph was tounge in cheek if I offended anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
427sohc Posted May 16, 2004 Report Share Posted May 16, 2004 anyone see the nonkhar ad on page 73? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt Posted May 16, 2004 Report Share Posted May 16, 2004 427sohc-- I don't get the magazine. Would you mind elaborating? Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now