Jump to content

New M3


EM1/SS
 Share

Recommended Posts

I have a question on my sear. I purchased some M3 parts months ago and one of the items was a sear. It has a raise lip on it that mine does not have. Is the raised lip the early or the late part, or is it an M3A1 part?

 

Mine:

 

http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa288/kent158/100_6140_zpsa6c571d3.jpg

 

The one I bought:

 

http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa288/kent158/standard1_zps21b2e75f.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EM1/SS

I believe that alexander is correct about the sear. It has a slightly wider surface for bearing against the sear notch. I think I put one in my M3.

Does your bolt have an "H" stamped on the right side , visible when the cover is open. If it does, the you have a heat treated bolt. I not you get some wear on the bolt sear notch.

Jim C

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My bolt is a Baffalo Arms. I'm going to look for a GL bolt. I bought a complete bolt months ago, but it is an Ittaca bolt.

EM1,

The Buffalo bolt is the correct bolt for your M3. What's the date stamped on the rear of the bolt? The Ithaca bolts were spare parts, If I remember correctly.

Suggest you buy Frank I's book on the M3.

Jim C

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is an H and a P on the bolt.

EM1,

Your good to go.

One more thing that I did with my M3. I cut 3 buffers from a plastic milk jug, in the shape of the rear spring guide (rear plate) and punched 2 holes in them. I put one between the bolt springs and rear plate. I put 2 between the rear plate and receiver.

Why?? Because I read in Frank I's book about cracking at the rear of receiver. Don't know how much good they do, but they don't do any harm and didn't cost anything.

Jim C

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

There is an H and a P on the bolt.

EM1,

Your good to go.

One more thing that I did with my M3. I cut 3 buffers from a plastic milk jug, in the shape of the rear spring guide (rear plate) and punched 2 holes in them. I put one between the bolt springs and rear plate. I put 2 between the rear plate and receiver.

Why?? Because I read in Frank I's book about cracking at the rear of receiver. Don't know how much good they do, but they don't do any harm and didn't cost anything.

Jim C

 

I have a friend whose M3A1 is cracking at the rear of the receiver. I believe his is a Medea gun. It started cracking within the last 10 years or so.

 

David Albert

dalbert@sturmgewehr.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if we could talk the makers of the Thompson pads to do a run of these for our M3s ? A two piece double disk for the early style and a disk with a " ] " cut in the back to fit the late style ?

Chris

Edited by emmagee1917
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if we could talk the makers of the Thompson pads to do a run of these for our M3s ? A two piece double disk for the early style and a disk with a " ] " cut in the back to fit the late style ?

Chris

Chris,

I think the normal TSMG buffer pads would be way to thick to fit behind the rear recoil plate, but I guess it would work between the springs and recoil plate. But then you would still have the rear plate banging against the rear of receiver.

Jim C

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was why I was thinking 2-piece. A disk with a cutout for either the M3 or M3A1 style guide that would be thin to the rear and " cupping " the guide plate and covering the rear of the reciever except for the very outer edge. It would be held in place by the rods going through the reciever going through 2 holes in the disk as well as the plate fitting in it's recess. The front piece would fit behind the recoil springs and fit like a lid over the rear piece , also held in place by the rods and the rear piece itself. This would spread the bolt's impact over all the rear of the reciever while preventing metal to metal between bolt / plate / reciever. It could not be thick like the Thompson's , but even at twice the thickness of the rear plate , it should help a lot without causing undo stress by restricting bolt travel. A fraction of an inch in travel could be added by the pack causing the bbl to tighten a part of a turn sooner do to the rear pad pushing the entire stack forward. This fraction of an inch of movement must be small enough to not affect sear lock up.One could also take a small slice off the rear of the bolt to give room for a pad in the bolt travel.We are talking about 1/16 to 1/8 inch or so.

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...