Nice 28 On Sturm But....

[TNKen]

Here's my AO '28 Thompson. You can see the grind mark in the frame where the "US" came off with the "halo", as well as the "C" stamped over the "1" SN 151106X. The question seems to be is this what happened to your Thompson, followed by a refinish.

 

Ken

 

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v311/TNKen/Thompson1928ACAOleftside.jpg

[gijive]

QUOTE (PhilOhio @ Oct 3 2005, 09:16 AM)

You spurred me to do what I should have done long ago.  I just mailed off a FOIA request to see if there are records suggesting when my gun was first registered to the Maryland PD.

Phil,

 

Sounds interesting, keep us posted on the results. It doesn't take them too long to do the search, I did one recently. I think it was just a few weeks.

 

We'll be interested to hear what you find out.

[Lancer]

QUOTE (PhilOhio @ Oct 3 2005, 10:16 AM)

You spurred me to do what I should have done long ago. I just mailed off a FOIA request to see if there are records suggesting when my gun was first registered to the Maryland PD.

I was rather disappointed in the FOIA request reply on my Albany Ga. PD gun, it only went back to 1982 which I assume is when the PD sold it.

[gijive]

QUOTE (Lancer @ Oct 3 2005, 09:58 AM)

I was rather disappointed in the FOIA request reply on my Albany Ga. PD gun, it only went back to 1982 which I assume is when the PD sold it.

Lancer,

 

Your request did not include the original copies of the registration papers when the Albany, GA P.D. registered the gun? Yes, you would be correct that the 1982 date would have been when they sold it, but there also should have ben a copy of the original registration, presuming it was a post WWII sale to a police agency.

 

Is it an AOC variety gun with the US ground off the receiver?

[Lancer]

QUOTE (gijive @ Oct 3 2005, 11:55 AM)

Your request did not include the original copies of the registration papers when the Albany, GA P.D. registered the gun?  Yes, you would be correct that the 1982 date would have been when they sold it, but there also should have ben a copy of the original registration, presuming it was a post WWII sale to a police agency. Is it an AOC variety gun with the US ground off the receiver?

It's a 1928ac with US ground off, #AO150969x. Smooth barrel, Lyman L sight, cross bolt stock. The FOIA reply did not included the original copies of the PD registration forms. I had hoped that this form would be included, I just assumed that it wasn't available. Do you think there's any use in pursuing this further?

 

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v713/Lancer1717/1928ac.jpg

[gijive]

QUOTE (Lancer @ Oct 3 2005, 11:35 AM)

The FOIA reply did not included the original copies of the PD registration forms. I had hoped that this form would be included, I just assumed that it wasn't available. Do you think there's any use in pursuing this further?

Lancer,

 

I would think so. The gun had to have been registered sometime in the 1950's or 1960's in order for the police department to have sold it in 1982. Even if had been amnesty registered in 1968 a copy of the amnesty registration shoud have been included. Many of the guns like yours went to law enforcement agencies after WWII. It would be interesting to determine who registered them and when.

[Arthur Fliegenheimer]

You can appeal to the following authority:

 

Office Of Information & Privacy

U.S. Department Of Justice

Flag Building

Suite 570

Washington, D.C. 20530-0001

 

But it is a rigged deck over at ATF. They arbitrarily omit and redact information without any explanation. I submitted an appeal for documents going back further than the 1970's

that were omitted from my original request. They sent me back an additional two pages. My own Form 3 and the previous form that of course was already in my possession. Thanks!

 

Even if they include the document, they will redact the name of the owner (transferor), even if it is a public organization such as a PD, and the name of the transferee. For some reason, known Roger Cox owned TSMG's, have had his name redacted from the copied forms. I wonder if his arrest and jail time has anything to do with this bizarre discretion on the part of ATF?

 

The original purchasing police department may or may not be sympathetic to your request as well

[gijive]

QUOTE (Arthur Fliegenheimer @ Oct 3 2005, 01:44 PM)

Even if they include the document, they will redact the name of the owner (transferor), even if it is a public organization such as a PD, and the name of the transferee.  For some reason, known Roger Cox owned TSMG's, have had his name redacted from the copied forms.  I wonder if his arrest and jail time has anything to do with this bizarre discretion on the part of ATF? The original purchasing police department may or may not be sympathetic to your request as well[/b][/color]

Arthur, you are correct, of course. Even if the name of the PD is omitted, however, the date of the transfer would be available. One could then conclude that that was the date the PD registered the gun, unless it was transferred to more than one agency. I think that is what PhilOhio is trying to determine; exactly when his gun was registered by the PD that owned it.

 

Interesting comment about Roger Cox's guns.

[Lancer]

I looked over the appeal procedure and decided to send it in. I'll post the reply went I receive it. It seems to me that the original registration form has to be there, it's just a matter of getting them to dig deep enough to find it.

 

Does anyone know, was Roger Cox located in Athens, Ga. in the early 80's? If so this gun may have passed through his hands.

 

 

 

Arthur

I don't get your point about about Roger Cox. Are you suggesting that their redacting policy may be the result of the Roger Cox case?

[gijive]

QUOTE (Lancer @ Oct 4 2005, 08:32 AM)

Does anyone know, was Roger Cox located in Athens, Ga. in the early 80's? If so this gun may have passed through his hands.

Lancer,

 

Yes, Roger Cox was in Athens, GA in the early 1980's. Does your form show the Athens, GA address, but the name has been redacted? If so, the gun was probably purchased from the PD by Roger.

 

No, the redaction policy had nothing to do with Roger Cox. They edit any names that you wouldn't be authorized to have. I'm not sure what their ctiteria is for redacting the names, but they even redacted Colt Patent Firearms on a form I saw.

[Lancer]

QUOTE (gijive @ Oct 4 2005, 10:08 AM)

Yes, Roger Cox was in Athens, GA in the early 1980's.  Does your form show the Athens, GA address, but the name has been redacted?  If so, the gun was probably purchased from the PD by Roger.

I have no hard evidence that this gun passed through Roger's hands or Athens, Ga, for that matter. The evidence I have is anecdotal in nature.

 

Late last year I had some contact with the Albany, Ga. PD. I inquired whether they had any record of the gun or if anyone remembered it. In return for their efforts in helping me track down the its history I would donate a large photo of the gun to display in their museum. (I feel terrible that I haven't followed through on my promise. Gotta get that done.)

 

Below is the reply I received from them. He says that the gun was traded to another PD in Athens, but it seems to me a more likely scenario would have been that they were traded to Roger Cox. What PD in the 1980's would want to trade modern SMG's for a 40yr. old Tommy gun?

 

 

"Tod,

 

Thanks for that information. I have asked around and don’t have much but will pass what I have so far. Our Department had 2 of those guns, but how or when we got them I have not found out yet. They were used on the “Rifle Squad.” In addition to them, we had two .30-06 deer rifles and two AR-15’s. The squad was converted to a SWAT team around 1980, and somewhere in the 90’s the name was changed to SRT (special reaction team). The guns were traded to another department for three Mach 10’s. I have not found anyone yet who for sure knows what department, but one of the Majors thinks it was Athens-Clarke County."

 

Our Chief remembers firing one of the guns years ago in a field somewhere in the east side of Albany. He’s not sure when or if that is in fact the gun.

 

I’ll keep trying. I look forward to making the arrangements to get the donated pictures you mentioned for our museum collection we’re putting together."

[Arthur Fliegenheimer]

Lancer,

 

I was just speculating why ATF would redact Cox's name from a Form 3, a well known Class III dealer, but not redact the name of a lessor known Class III dealer on another Form 3. It is their policy to turn these forms into something resembling a WWII G.I. POW's letter to his wife.

 

But my brief with the FOIA release of ATF documents is that they redact the name of the police department that was the original owner of the weapon. Naturally, the names of private citizens should not be released, but if they arbitrarily allow a Class 3 dealer's name to go un-censored on their copied forms, then why censor the name of a public service organization?

 

In other words, if you did not already know the PD that purchased your TSMG (Colt or WWII), you would not uncover the name of the PD from a FOIA ATF request.

 

Not only that, you would also not get even a redacted copy of that PD"s (assuming they purchased it after 1934 from Auto-Ord/Federal Labs and it was registered before 1968) ATF Form. And that is really the document one might expect to get after waiting three months for this FOIA request to materialize in your mail box.

[gijive]

QUOTE (Arthur Fliegenheimer @ Oct 4 2005, 12:25 PM)

Not only that, you would also not get even a redacted copy of that PD"s (assuming they purchased it after 1934 from Auto-Ord/Federal Labs and it was registered before 1968) ATF Form. And that is really the document one might expect to get after waiting three months for this FOIA request to materialize in your mail box.[/b][/color]

Arthur,

 

How come one wouldn't get a redacted copy of a registration form prior to 1968? Maybe I didn't read the Freedom of Information guidelines closely enough, do they only go back a certain number of years?

 

If a police agency registered a Thomspon, say in the early 1950's, that wouldn't be available or ATF would not forward that document? If this is the case, can you explain their rationale for not sending early registration forms?

[Lancer]

QUOTE (Arthur Fliegenheimer @ Oct 4 2005, 01:25 PM)

Lancer, I was just speculating why ATF would redact Cox's name from a Form 3, a well known Class III dealer, but not redact the name of a lessor known Class III dealer on another Form 3. It is their policy to turn these forms into something resembling a WWII G.I. POW's letter to his wife.

Arthur

OK, I see what you are saying now. The reason for my confusion is that the FOIA form copies that I received, ALL names were redacted including the form 3.

[Arthur Fliegenheimer]

QUOTE (gijive @ Oct 4 2005, 12:41 PM)

How come one wouldn't get a redacted copy of a registration form prior to 1968?  Maybe I didn't read the Freedom of Information guidelines closely enough, do they only go back a certain number of years? If a police agency registered a Thomspon, say in the early 1950's, that wouldn't be available or ATF would not forward that document?  If this is the case, can you explain their rationale for not sending early registration forms?

gijive,

 

As far as I can determine, from the back and forth of snail mail contacts with Richard L. Huff, Co-Director DOJ OIP, who isn't programed to respond to specific questions, but sticks to his form letter guidelines, these FOIA firearms ownership histories only cover the transfers of firearms from dealers to dealers, dealers to private parties, private parties to dealers, but not original manufacturer/seller(Auto-Ord-Fed Labs) to buyer (PD, or private party), or the original PD ATF registration.

 

Here is the explanation for why they held back the info I requested:

 

"The ATF properly withheld from you information that is protected from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act pursuant to:

 

5 U.S.C. & 552(http://www.machinegunbooks.com/forums/invboard1_1_2/upload/html/emoticons/cool.gif (2), which concerns matters that are related to internal agency practices;

 

5 U.S.C. & 552 (http://www.machinegunbooks.com/forums/invboard1_1_2/upload/html/emoticons/cool.gif (3), which concerns matters specifically exempted from release by statue (in this instance, 26 U.S.C. &6103, which concerns the protection of tax return information) ; and

 

5 U.S.C. & 552 (http://www.machinegunbooks.com/forums/invboard1_1_2/upload/html/emoticons/cool.gif (6), which concerns material the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of the personal privacy of third parties.

 

I have also determined that this information is not appropriate for discretionary release."

 

If you are dissatisfied with my action on your appeal, you may seek judicial review in accordance with 5 U.S>C. & 552 (a) (4) (http://www.machinegunbooks.com/forums/invboard1_1_2/upload/html/emoticons/cool.gif."

 

My case was on the Supreme Court's calendar but got bumped by Anna Nichole Smith.

[gijive]

QUOTE (Arthur Fliegenheimer @ Oct 4 2005, 02:57 PM)

My case was on the Supreme Court's calendar but got bumped by Anna Nichole Smith.

Hah, that was a good one!

 

Too bad they don't release the PD registration forms as a general rule. Many guns were registered by Police agencies after WWII and in the 1950's. That kind of information would be invaluable to collector's who are trying to track the history of their gun. Especially the sale of many guns the last few years that have changed hands repeatedly because of ever increasing upward prices.

 

I thought I had seen someone post a Freedom of Information request on this list a couple of years back that had some earlier information. Maybe my memory is failing me in that respect. I thought some early PD registrations might be available.

 

Thanks for the interesting response.

[Lancer]

After reading Arthur's last post, it sounds like an appeal would be a waste of time.

[Arthur Fliegenheimer]

QUOTE (PhilOhio @ Oct 5 2005, 10:02 AM)

Starting now.  Several days ago, I mailed off an FOIA request regarding the transfer history of my Thompson.  I mentioned that I was primarily interested in the uncensored registration documentation of the Maryland PD which originally owned the gun.  I also pointedly noted that, since the PD was not an entity whose personal privacy was protected, I expected to be receiving the information requested.  And so I do, one way or another. I hope I am getting unnecessarily steamed up, and that I will get what I asked for, without the delays which will end in grudging compliance anyway.  Look at it this way.  In just about every state in the union there is a sunshine law which would require the PD to let you Zerox the MG registration forms if you asked.  No big deal.  Who in the LE world could possibly care?  And now some conehead in D.C. says we can't have it?  Get serious.

Phil,

 

I am positive that you will not get these documents on your first application for them. Nor even on your second, or third, or maybe even fourth. My second request on appeal prompted a letter from Jesse M. Price, Disclosure Specialist, that began, "This is our FINAL response to your FOIA ........"

 

That is when I appealed it to Huff, twice. His last correspondence stated, "After careful consideration on this matter, I have determined that my initial decision as outlined in my letter to you was appropriate."

 

Then I appealed it to the so-called judicial review. All of this took over nine months of correspondence from the first FOIA request to the final rejected request on judicial appeal.

 

Unless you still have suction with Washington D.C. bureaucracies or hire an attorney who specializes in these matters, you better prepare to lay in a supply of asparagus for your pent up steam.