Jump to content

New L Drums: Inspection Report & Group Buy


Recommended Posts

Inspection

 

For the purposes of this report, “early drums” means WH & early Kahr production (apologies to the pre 1950's products)

 

A group of 7 new production Kahr L drums are involved in this study. These were NIB and unused. I feel a lot of this quantity is adequate to give a reasonable picture of what to expect from this production run.

 

A comprehensive inspection was not attempted, but several areas that have proven problematical with the early drums were examined, as well as areas generally considered “important”.

 

The Guide (spiral which directs the cartridges) in the Body is of singular importance in the function of the drum. If there are places where the cartridges cannot pass, the drum simply won’t work. In inspecting this feature, a gage is used which represents the minimum dimension given in the GI print. This Gage is larger than the maximum cartridge and if the guide will accept it, there will be no binding during operation. In some instances the guides would not gage and could not be adjusted to gage. In this case, free movement of actual cartridges was checked and is considered the sub minimal standard. Due to the expense of ammunition and time constraints, it was decided to adjust the guides as required prior to testing.

 

Of the 7 drums, only one would gage without adjustment, 2 could not be brought to gage, all passed cartridges freely. The adjustments made were more easily accomplished than in early drums.

 

The Cartridge Aperture refers to the slot in the top of the body through which the cartridge being fed into the gun is visible. This slot positions the round and keeps it in place. All of the samples are oversize by about .075. I consider this to be the major fault of this production. There are ways to address it and these include adding metal or moving the lip of the slot adjacent to the deflector to cause a V type of support for the cartridge. If the drum works in it’s current condition, then I guess it’s a moot point for now.

 

The Mounting Plates have proven to be a real problem in the early drums, most not fitting guns at all without some serious reforming. I am pleased to report that all measure OK (although the form isn’t quite up to the print) and fit a gun of known dimension with just the slightest drag in one place. I feel this will quickly abate with use, and fitting to an ‘in spec’ gun will not be a problem. One exception had the rear plate rivets only partially set, causing them to hit the frame. When reset, all was well. The opposite ends of those rivets, on all samples, are not properly formed and this causes the ratchet to “click” 12 times per revolution instead of 4. The heads of these rivets can be reset & trimmed to eliminate this trouble.

 

The Winding Key slot is about .005 small on all examples and will not work with most Pre 1950 drums. The Guard was bent down on 6 of the samples, which made lifting the latch difficult. This was easily straightened.

 

Metal Hardness specifications call for a soft, low carbon, mild steel that can be formed to the shapes necessary. I tested the hardness of the body of a WH, new Kahr and (choke) my Bridgeport. The results are as follows: HRB 53, 46, 54 respectively. The guides in the new Kahr appear to be softer than the GI parts.

 

Other Things noted were that the tail of the guide was not bent around at its end to indicate the area into which cartridges were not to be placed; you could actually get 54 rounds into the drum, but this is not recommended. I bent some of these in various ways, just playing.

 

The Rotor is formed in such a way as to not have as great a surface area pushing on the cartridge as the early drums had. I did not see any problem with this during bench testing, as long as the guides were spaced correctly.

 

Many parts have burrs on the edges.

 

 

Range Report

 

I took 6 drums to the range for firing in a 28 TSMG known for flawless function and cycling at a clocked rate of 740 RPM (the seventh drum was tested previously and function was fine). Firing was a continuous burst until the drum was empty, or stopped for some other reason.

 

Only one drum would not run, the others were flawless. The offending drum had been the most difficult to adjust in the initial inspection of the body and guides and was subsequently found to be suffering from a cover guide alignment problem as well as some slight drag of the rotor on the body. These flaws were corrected and I expect this drum will run fine during the next range outing.

 

The oversize cartridge aperture allows the top round to sit high enough to preclude the insertion of the loaded drum into the gun unless the cartridge is pressed into the magazine with a finger, allowing it to clear the magazine well of the receiver. This was easily accomplished, presenting no serious problem.

 

Summery

 

Overall, we see improvements in this new production run and feel good about the way the mags fit the guns and the ease with which the majority of the samples evaluated can be adjusted. The oversize cartridge aperture is the sour apple but doesn’t seem to affect function in the short run. Merle and I are in consultation as to how to effectively correct this condition, should a long run problem arise.

 

 

Group Buy; here’s the deal

 

If any of you guys want to proceed with a group buy, I am willing to facilitate the same.

 

No additional warranty. Please keep in mind that I will not warrant in any way the Kahr product as received, I will simply be passing the unopened box to you. If you need to pursue a warranty claim, you must go directly to Kahr.

 

Tuning or other services on your drum could be discussed separately, should you desire such. It would appear that the average basic tune up would cost less than $25 + ammo ($11 a load), but this would be a case by case issue. I can not speak for Merle on this, only myself.

 

Limit. In an attempt to be fair, let’s limit this buy to three (3) drums per customer.

 

Time frame. Orders will be accepted until Monday 1/3/05, after that, this buy is closed.

 

Terms. An order is accepted when full payment in cash, check or money order is received. Sorry, no CC or PayPal. Orders will be shipped in the sequence they were received, first in, first out. The only thing that counts here is paper in hand, please don’t email and ask me hold you a place. Drums will be shipped until current supply is exhausted. If additional supplies are available, they will be brought in ASAP to fill all orders received. Personal checks will not be cashed unless there is stock to fill the order. If current supply is inadequate to fill all orders received, outstanding orders will be notified. All orders subject to price increases from shipping company’s or suppliers (there was already a $10 increase from Kahr in receiving this shipment).

 

Make checks payable to: Diamond K

 

Mail to:

Diamond K

1390 E. 7th St.

Delta, CO 81416

 

Pricing. By averaging the shipping, the cost of each drum will be $199, delivered to your door in the lower 48 states. Subject to change without notice (nice lawyer speech, huh?). CO residents, add applicable sales tax

 

If you desire to have one of the test group, they are available for an additional $11 to cover the ammo used in testing. Email to check availability prior to sending your order. These are offered “as they are” with no further representation being made.

 

In Closing, I wish to acknowledge and thank Merle for his consultation on this endeavor, and those whose jobs have been delayed a few days by it’s execution; thanks to you all.

 

 

Wishing you all a very Merry Christmas!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

PK, Thanks for all the footwork on these drums- A check is in the mail to you for two of the "test drums" if still available. Michael Land
Link to comment
Share on other sites

PK,

 

Thank you very much for taking the time to test and give a very objective view of these new drums. Like PhilOhio, I'm tempted to get one (especially since the price is definately right, including the tune up service you are offering) but I feel Phil's comments are spot on regarding Kahr's QC. I'm going to hold back and not get one based on the quality of at least the initial batch of drums. It's really a sad a quality product has not been put forth. They would sell like hot cakes (and maybe will anyway) if the quality was there.

 

Again, thank you very much,

 

marks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Happy to be of service guys.

 

The test drums are all spoken for, sorry.

 

I have not checked the board since this morning and apparently some of you who posted a desire for a test drum will be disappointed, as I was working from e mils in determining who got them. If you did not get an e mail confirmation from me, then you did not get a test drum. I am sorry for any confusion.

 

*******

 

Phil, we all know and agree that the details should have been right from the factory, I hope they are someday, but this is now and we deal with what we have. While I respect your decision, I have to take exception to the main reason you give for making it.

 

The metal used for the body is not “Way To Soft”. The testing shows (if not conclusively) that it is very little softer that the two other parts tested and well within an expected standard for this type of formed part; nothing substandard here that I can see from the tests performed. If we tested 100 GI drums and 100 new Kahrs I bet the average wouldn’t differ by more than a point or two. We won’t know until we actually do it however, if we ever get the chance. This is not a concern to me.

 

I do not know, but believe that the cartridge aperture was purposely made as large as it is with an eye towards insuring reliable feeding. That was a mistake and points out the root of the problem with all things Kahr and Thompson; the guys making the decisions about this don’t understand things Thompson. Simple as that. FWIW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I, like Robert, live in one of those East coast states (N.Y.) where the 'nanny state commissars' think they know what is best for the subjects. http://www.machinegunbooks.com/forums/invboard1_1_2/upload/html/emoticons/blink.gif http://www.machinegunbooks.com/forums/invboard1_1_2/upload/html/emoticons/sad.gif Consequently, New York has its own assault weapon/large capacity magazine ban. http://www.machinegunbooks.com/forums/invboard1_1_2/upload/html/emoticons/mad.gif http://www.machinegunbooks.com/forums/invboard1_1_2/upload/html/emoticons/ph34r.gif
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering new "L" Drums can be had off Sturmgewehr for $200.00, I really don't see how the term Group Buy applies. Normally, (As I have participated in many group buys in the past.) a Group Buy is just that. An individual getting what he wants at a discounted price by purchasing a large quantity, thus passing the discount on to fellow man. I would have figured the price would have been lower than $199.00........
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (427sohc @ Dec 22 2004, 03:59 PM)
for $199.00 you cant go wrong,10 years from now they will be 5 times this much.

Or, more likely, in 10 years, new ones will be $199, plus an inflation adjustment.

 

This isn't a one off production run never to be done again. i suspect they will make them until their orders are filled, then lay in a thousand for stock, then when thsoe are gone, they will make another run.

 

Doug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (PhilOhio @ Dec 22 2004, 10:54 PM)
People in the gun business are learning hard lessons. One is not to speculate heavily.

Just another reason I won't pay $25K+ for a gun that may be legislated into a Canada style transfer system (Only future transfers to existing C3 ownwers).

 

 

Yeah, I bit the bullet 10 years ago and plunked down $2K on a WH and $2700 on a S 1928A1, but I would not pay huge amounts for any FA gun now; the rate of appreciation will not continue, and the downside is too great. 500% over the past 10 years is OK, but anybody that thinks todays $25K TSMG is going to sell for $125K in 2015 better put down the crack pipe.

 

Doug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (PhilOhio @ Dec 23 2004, 12:02 AM)
QUOTE (timkel @ Dec 22 2004, 05:22 PM)
How wide should the drum Cartridge Aperture be?

timkel,

 

I never paid any attention to this dimension before, until PK brought it up. So I just measured my early Colt "L" drum #4180. It has virtually no wear on it, inside and out. So I assume the dimensions are all pretty close to the original specification.

 

From rear to front, for a distance of about .8", the width of the aperture is a uniform .380" to .381". From that point forward, the right lip continues as a straight edge, but the left lip widens, in a straight line toward the left, to about .450" at the forward edge of the rear shell.

 

This was curious to me, in that the release channel does not widen uniformly, both left and right.

 

A cartridge cannot sit very high in this aperture, and it is not cocked upward at all. It rides straight forward into the feed channel. And it looks to me as though there is no force which would make it rise as it is released forward.

 

I'm sure PK understands a whole lot more about the dynamics of this, because to me it is much different from the way the Suomi and PPSh drums release their rounds (upward).

 

Now, PK said the Kahr apertures were a few thousandths OVER .070" too wide, as I recall. That's a bunch. So if you add this to .380" you get .450", bullet diameter. The case is only a few thousandths wider. That means almost nothing is holding the round between the lips. It means that the whole width of the aperture on the Kahr drums is probably about the same width as the widest part of the forward release area on my Colt drum. I can't imagine something like that coming out of a factory, or being designed that way. Draw your own conclusions. I have.

 

But order away, guys. We don't shoot 'em much anyway. They will look nice.

I checked the size of the aperture on my kahr drum. It is oversize like PK says. But it doesn't seem to effect function at all. If it does become a problem, repair looks simple.

Seems like it would be a simple adjustment for Kahr to make during production.

http://www.hunt101.com/img/233263-big.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't worry about the legislated out of existence theory; that is something that is unpredictable and, if happens, will probably be based on some unforeseen event. However, as Doug states, the current rate of growth is clearly unsustainable. Anyone that has several Thompsons they paid only a few thousand dollars for (or less) many years ago should take some profit. As with stocks and mutual funds, trying to time the market so to speak will only result in disappointment for the majority of people. I say several Thompsons because I would not sell the one Thompson I own regardless of price - but I do consider it a highly valued asset in my portfolio of worldly possessions. The problem with paying 18K and up for a well-used 1928 or M1 Thompson is the possibility of some change in the law that would allow importation of these widely available Thompsons into the United States. If this were to happen, the value of these WWII (and West Hurley) Thompsons would plummet overnight. What about Colt Thompsons? These too would see a drop in price because there are enough Colt Thompsons that could be brought into the United States to have an instant affect on prices. Of course, the class three market is not only about Thompsons. If the Class Three market were to continue as it has in the last five years, it would not be too long until the entry level machine gun will be 10K. If that happens, the number of potential customers will rapidly decline as will the number of dealers. How many people do you think will be paying 10K for a MAC or 50K for a Thompson? Let me assure you it will not be many – and not enough to sustain any type of market for these items. Look at the recent stock market correction and expiration of the Assault Weapons Ban as what can happen to highly valued items overnight. Anyone want to admit they are happy for paying $900 for that West Hurley L drum two years ago? Buying anything at the top of the market is a sure recipe for disaster. Regardless of what you subscribe to, the legislated out of existence theory or the market theory, both are enough reason for the cautious person to stay out the Class Three market for the foreseeable future.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...