

Got Some Mags Ordered.
#1
Posted 31 March 2004 - 10:17 AM

#2
Posted 31 March 2004 - 11:47 AM
#3
Posted 31 March 2004 - 12:21 PM

#4
Posted 31 March 2004 - 04:37 PM
all 5 mags(XXX's) are brand spank'n new.
if only i could find new XX's....
#5
Posted 31 March 2004 - 05:04 PM
#6
Posted 31 March 2004 - 07:10 PM
QUOTE (brian @ Mar 31 2004, 04:37 PM) |
about 2 months ago, i ordered the 5+a pouch mag set, from them. all 5 mags(XXX's) are brand spank'n new. if only i could find new XX's.... |
I hope these are not pictures of your "new" mags.
#7
Posted 31 March 2004 - 07:24 PM



#8
Posted 31 March 2004 - 09:53 PM
QUOTE (JimFromFL @ Mar 31 2004, 07:10 PM) | ||
I hope these are not pictures of your "new" mags. |
Why? Look good to me... Need the grease cleaned off is all....
#9
Posted 31 March 2004 - 10:08 PM
QUOTE (Z3BigDaddy @ Mar 31 2004, 09:53 PM) | ||||
Why? Look good to me... Need the grease cleaned off is all.... |
Unless it was the picture on the screen, the mags did not look "new". Granted even new mags are old, I have gotten some with 100% blue, not dents and scratches for $15 each. The picture, mostly the top mag looks to be dented near the bottom and the bottom mag looks like it has had a lot of rough handling.
#10
Posted 01 April 2004 - 12:05 AM
#11
Posted 01 April 2004 - 11:56 AM
I have to agree with Big Daddy on this one. The mags look new and undented, albeit with the need for a little cleanup. Light refletions can cause (or hide) all sorts of things, but in this case it just looks like a good cleaning will show these to be really nice mags.
TN.Frank,
I agree with others that $30 is a bit steep, but I support your purchase if this is your only practical source of good mags. Some times I do a lot of lookin and no findin for items at the "going rate".
#12
Posted 01 April 2004 - 04:59 PM
QUOTE (JimFromFL @ Mar 31 2004, 10:08 PM) | ||||||
Unless it was the picture on the screen, the mags did not look "new". Granted even new mags are old, I have gotten some with 100% blue, not dents and scratches for $15 each. The picture, mostly the top mag looks to be dented near the bottom and the bottom mag looks like it has had a lot of rough handling. |
trust me, they're brand new and straight as an arrow with 100% bluing. and yes the pic is poor.
i has just got'n the worse of the cosmo off and snaped a pic.

#13
Posted 01 April 2004 - 10:28 PM

#14
Posted 03 April 2004 - 08:11 AM

Other than being filled with a bunch of grease, I think these mags are just about perfect. $15 each.
#15
Posted 03 April 2004 - 10:29 AM
#16
Posted 03 April 2004 - 12:46 PM

#17
Posted 03 April 2004 - 01:16 PM
Please understand I'm not meaning to question your decision. I'm just making sure everyone doesn't automatically conclude from this thread that the $15 Thompson mags from CDNN are junk. Good luck to all!
#18
Posted 03 April 2004 - 02:29 PM