http://www.merriam-w... submachine gun
Jr
Webster Defines The Thompson
Started by
John Jr
, May 03 2004 12:10 AM
12 replies to this topic
#1
John Jr
-
- Regular Group
-
- 1956 posts
Long Time RKI Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:Mena, Arkansas, USA
- Interests:Plenty
Posted 03 May 2004 - 12:10 AM
#2
John Jr
-
- Regular Group
-
- 1956 posts
Long Time RKI Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:Mena, Arkansas, USA
- Interests:Plenty
#3
chitowngangster
-
- Regular Group
-
- 242 posts
Outlaw History Expert - Long Time RKI Member
- Gender:Male
Posted 03 May 2004 - 06:23 AM
lol 
Chitown
Chitown
Edited by chitowngangster, 03 May 2004 - 06:23 AM.
#4
The1930sRust
-
- Moderator
-
- 1939 posts
Respected Member and Board Donor
- Gender:Male
- Location:Confederate, Kentucky
- Interests:Thompsons, obviously. Proud West Hurley 1928 and Savage M1 owner, cave explorer, and KSP trooper (retired). Also interested in 1920-1930 American history. I appreciate all Thompson models and their owners.
Posted 03 May 2004 - 07:13 AM
Whoa! Careful there, boys. This might get ugly. And, remember, AF has more dictionaries that all the rest of us combined.....;-)
#5
giantpanda4
-
- Board Benefactor
-
- 2062 posts
Respected Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:Howell, MI 48855
- Interests:Mechanical toys - cars, instruments, and of course - guns. The 1921-28 thompsons are the epitomy of perfection for a mechanical device that fills all my interests!
Posted 03 May 2004 - 07:29 AM
Jr,
Excellent!
Excellent!
#6
JimFromFL
-
- Regular Group
-
- 1877 posts
Long Time RKI Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:Florida
Posted 03 May 2004 - 07:29 AM
Kind of useless information????
Just the fact that it even exists within the dictionary says a lot.
Remember, if they were to provide all the information, the information just for the Thompson alone would be the size of a dictionary.
Just the fact that it even exists within the dictionary says a lot.
Remember, if they were to provide all the information, the information just for the Thompson alone would be the size of a dictionary.
#7
Arthur Fliegenheimer
-
- Regular Group
-
- 3453 posts
Respected Member
- Gender:Male
Posted 03 May 2004 - 11:26 AM
John Jr,
Your recent heuristic tendencies are indeed impressive! Now that you have invested in an Easy Reader Dictionary perhaps you might look up pudenda. It should be easy to spot, it will have your picture beside it.
Your recent heuristic tendencies are indeed impressive! Now that you have invested in an Easy Reader Dictionary perhaps you might look up pudenda. It should be easy to spot, it will have your picture beside it.
#8
hawksnest
-
- Regular Group
-
- 1008 posts
Long Time RKI Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:central Ohio
- Interests:Class III weapons
Posted 03 May 2004 - 12:48 PM
Arthur: My dictionary says a colt is a young stud. Perhaps John means you will become a stallion.
#9
Bill in VA
-
- Regular Group
-
- 652 posts
Long Time RKI Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:Southwest Virginia
Posted 03 May 2004 - 03:52 PM
Ummm, Arthur, are you sure you know the meaning of "pudenda"? You seem to be saying John Jr. is the plural of female genitalia??? OK, I'm lost now.
#10
Sgt
-
- Board Benefactor
-
- 2047 posts
Long Time RKI Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:Eastern TN
- Interests:Militaria, Chess, Tools, Sherlock Holmes, Printmaking, UFOs, Ghosts, Electronics, Comic Books, Long walks in the rain, with my Savage 1928a1. (just kidding on the last one; it doesn't have to be raining) -- Ralph
Posted 03 May 2004 - 04:17 PM
I need a new oiler for my 'täm(p)-s&n-
#11
Arthur Fliegenheimer
-
- Regular Group
-
- 3453 posts
Respected Member
- Gender:Male
Posted 03 May 2004 - 05:35 PM
Bill In V,
If nothing else is gained here at least you have removed the layer of dust accumulating on your dictionary to find the word, or did you just rely on the internet?
If nothing else is gained here at least you have removed the layer of dust accumulating on your dictionary to find the word, or did you just rely on the internet?
#12
LSU Tiger
-
- Board Donor
-
- 324 posts
Long Time Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:Louisiana
- Interests:Military weapons from the 1700's to present day, pipe smokig and collecting, straight razor shaving, collecting WW II US uniforms, weapons, and equipment. Thompsons, especially!
Posted 03 May 2004 - 06:20 PM
Men, break out the rough weather gear! The level of bovine scatology is about to surpass all past levels! 
Edited by LSU Tiger, 03 May 2004 - 06:20 PM.
#13
Bill in VA
-
- Regular Group
-
- 652 posts
Long Time RKI Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:Southwest Virginia
Posted 03 May 2004 - 07:03 PM
Don't worry LSU, I got my chest waders on! Let it get deep!!!
Arthur, rather presumptuous of you, isn't it, to think that only you have such broad etymological skils.
No, I didn't need to dust off my lexicon (as if it ever even gets dusty!) nor did I need to rely on the 'net. Contrary to what you may believe, there are a few folks here on the board that do have a manageable grasp of the English language. BTW, at the risk of assumption, I believe you actually meant to call John Jr a "pudendum" (singular) and not a "pudenda" (plural.) In either case, neither word is paritcularly accurate when used to refer to the male genitalia. Oh, and after checking my dictionary, I didn't see any pictures beside either pudendum or pudenda.
Arthur, rather presumptuous of you, isn't it, to think that only you have such broad etymological skils.
No, I didn't need to dust off my lexicon (as if it ever even gets dusty!) nor did I need to rely on the 'net. Contrary to what you may believe, there are a few folks here on the board that do have a manageable grasp of the English language. BTW, at the risk of assumption, I believe you actually meant to call John Jr a "pudendum" (singular) and not a "pudenda" (plural.) In either case, neither word is paritcularly accurate when used to refer to the male genitalia. Oh, and after checking my dictionary, I didn't see any pictures beside either pudendum or pudenda.
