Value Of A 1921 Colt, Serial Number 41?
Posted 01 June 2004 - 06:39 PM
When I looked through Tracy Hills book this gun was the very first commercial gun released from production. Its unfortunate that only the upper and barrel assembly are original but maybe someone out there has the original serial number 41 lower.
Other than that, the upper is in great shape and I would rate it an easy 90%. It has the original finish on it as well.
Again, he has not decided to sell it yet but might in the very near future. So, I would be brokering this for him. The gun was registered during the amnesty and is currently on a form four.
Email me with your ideas on approximate value.
Posted 01 June 2004 - 06:49 PM
In the condition it is in not anywhere near 100% original parts, I would say a minimum of $20k with a #41 serial number and #41 barrel, I am assuming no original finish.
The 1st 1,000 TMSG's went out with #'s at the breach end of the barrel. If that is the original barrel you are in luck.
I am sure I will get flamed on that value assumption.
Posted 01 June 2004 - 06:56 PM
I don't think you are going to get any takers on that one, at least not on this Board. All the best information over the years indicates that Serial No. 41 was sold to the Government of Mexico. There were some parts kits imported some years ago, but the receivers were destroyed. That gun would have been unearthed years ago if it was legitimate.
The earliest number Colt gun part in private hands is grip frame No. 44, in a private collection. Somebody is putting you on or you are trying to put someone on. If you were positive about the legtimacy of the Colt receiver and barrel then you certainly would know if the wood was original. Your story doesn't sound right, sorry.
Forgot to answer your earlier question about value. If it did happen to be the real thing, you don't need our advice, you could name your price.
Posted 01 June 2004 - 07:17 PM
Posted 01 June 2004 - 08:24 PM
I am only forwarding what I saw. This guy is 78 years old and retired from the military. I purchased an original C&R M2 carbine from him 3 months ago that was his actuall carry gun during the Korean conflict. He brought out this Colt as I was wrapping up the paperwork and put it in my lap. It was indeed marked serial number 41 on the upper reciever and it was indeed a Colt. I have owned several Colt Thompsons in the past and this was the real deal. If you do not believe me well that is your perogative. But if and when he does decided to sell this gun I will be in a better position to give it a thorough work up. I only had a few minutes to look it over and as I posted above, the reciever did look like the original blue finish in remarakable condition. He got the gun from Fort Benning Ga during his return home from korea. His job in the military was involved with the arsenal in some capacity. Yes, it was registered because along with the gun he had the original amnesty paperwork attached to the buttstock!
Again, I am sorry you think this is some kind of bogus post but my only concern is to get this vet what he deserves if and when he decides to part with it. He currently is suffering from throat cancer so I cannot imagine him being around on this earth much longer. His family deserves to get the most out of his collection if he does pass and my intention is to assist them.
I used to be an active member of this board and I always found it helpful but I have since sold my Thompsons for other guns and I was only hoping to get some intelligent input and advice.
Thank you for your time.
Posted 01 June 2004 - 08:44 PM
Posted 01 June 2004 - 09:06 PM
Maybe the posts above are correct, maybe this is some type of forgery but based on his other guns and his history I sincerely doubt it.
Perhaps this will inevitably require a call to Tracie Hill but until this gentlemen decides to part with it, there is no reason to get too excited about it. It may be next week or next year.
Thanks again lionhart.
Posted 01 June 2004 - 09:07 PM
Posted 01 June 2004 - 09:11 PM
For now, I will just wait and see..
Good to here from you guys as well.......
Posted 01 June 2004 - 09:24 PM
I think you scared drbones with that chicken shit offer!
This guy liberated this Colt #41 from the Ft. Benning arsenal? But he also has amnesty paperwork? Seems he should be spliting the proceeds of the sale with Korean War era tax payers
Posted 01 June 2004 - 10:24 PM
If authentic, I would put it up for auction. Unfortunately, it may leave the United States if sold at auction. But if the need is to help this veteran and his family is of paramount importance, a properly conducted auction would provide the best return for value. I would first check with a tax specialist to see if it would be better to auction it before or after the veteran passes away. I believe this gun would bring well over 50K. An effort to minimize taxes on a sale like this would be the number one priority. Please keep us informed.
Posted 02 June 2004 - 06:47 AM
Posted 02 June 2004 - 09:37 AM
Would it be possible to get pics? That tells a lot!
Is this gun still in MI? I live in Howell, and would be happy to see it / photograph it with you!
By the way, there are a lot of Colt internals on Evilbay before they ban Tommy parts. One item is a complete lower- wonder what's inside it.
Posted 03 June 2004 - 03:06 PM
Posted 03 June 2004 - 04:38 PM
NAC gun now that is an interesting question!
Posted 03 June 2004 - 09:59 PM
The barrel must be removed to determine if the barrel number is 41 as well. If it were, then the gun would appear to be an authentic colt copy of an auto ordnance original.
If you want an appraisal doc, I would say that if it were the real thing, then some asinine colt collector would certainly pay $20+K for it.
Offer it at 35K and take any offer over 25k (the max value of a 99% condition 1928 Navy gun with every possible extra).
Posted 03 June 2004 - 10:12 PM
Posted 04 June 2004 - 01:52 AM
Speaking on numbers, i found a buttstock hanger in my parts collection that has a number stamped on it, 4137 or something. too bad i don't have the wood and buttplate to go with it. :-)
Posted 04 June 2004 - 09:53 AM