Posted 07 July 2004 - 12:43 PM
I have doublechecked the FAQ and did not find an answer.
I have a line an M1A1 parts kit in excellent condition at a fair price. I also have a form 1 kahr being worked on by PK. I know the kahr's are not supposedly capable of being converted to FA, but I also know that according the the ATF, just having parts in your posession that can can be plugged in can be considered posession of the a machine gun.
Anybody know if I am treading on thin ice by buying this kit?
Posted 07 July 2004 - 01:03 PM
OTOH, some over-zealous junior birdman looking to make a name for himself could defiinitely decide to charge you with constructive posession. Most likely you'd beat the rap, but not the ride or the legal bills. If you plan on keeping your parts kit, I'd suggest saying as little as possible about it. Of course, if you're like me, and fairly cost-conscious, you could keep the barrel, forearm, rear sight, and whatever else you can use, and part the rest out. Putting the torch-cut receiver pieces, stripped lower and individual internal parts on Ebay would probably net you returns equal to what you've sunk into the Form 1 tax and cost of labor in your new SBR.
Posted 07 July 2004 - 06:55 PM
Posted 07 July 2004 - 07:50 PM
If, for the sake of arguement, you own both an SBR semi-auto Thompson and an unmodified Title I semi-auto Thompson as well as a spare 10" bbl, you could most likely beat any constructive possession charges with a halfway competent lawyer. I would think that an approved Form 1 for your Thompson SBR could certainly help provide evidence that you are a law-abiding individual, since, if you weren't, you wouldn't have gone to the trouble getting an approved Form 1 for the SBR.
The BATF has issued a number of letters to individuals about similar situations, most involving AR15s, M16s, and spare M16 fire control parts. (I also recall one that dealt with the issue of spare shorty uppers in conjunction with legal possession of both an AR15 and an M16 but can't seem to find it at the moment.) In none of these letters do they ever say possession of those items constitutes contructive possession. Instead, all of those letters "strongly recommend" not possessing excess potential-NFA parts. My opinion is that the majority of these letters are purposefully vague so that they can't come back and bite the BATF on its collective fanny some day during a prosecution attempt.
Again, if it was me, and I had those two guns and a spare barrel, I'd not only keep the spare barrel out of sight, but also stay quiet about it.
Posted 12 July 2004 - 07:38 AM
Thanks for the advice. I was going to follow it but the kit was already sold. (imagine that!) So I'm on the lookout again. Maybe all the kits suddenly appearing from Joe Stalin's secret hoard will be off the market by the time I find another m1a1, so I won't have to worry about a midnight visit from our mutual friends at the ATF. (Besides, I need to be ready to pay PK's bill when it comes!)