
Kahr Now Pushing L Drums
#1
Posted 22 September 2004 - 08:33 AM
#2
Posted 22 September 2004 - 09:04 AM
96LT1: ever visit www.mfba.org ?
#3
Posted 22 September 2004 - 11:54 AM
#4
Posted 22 September 2004 - 12:30 PM
QUOTE (LIONHART @ Sep 22 2004, 11:54 AM) |
And $171.00 for an "X" Drum at that! |
I thought the 10 rounders were only $100 or so. Seems like they increased the price after the ban.

#5
Posted 22 September 2004 - 12:56 PM
#6
Posted 22 September 2004 - 01:56 PM
The way any new legal proposals look the 27 and M1 are going to be included with the rest of the quote assault weapons unless the bills don't pass.
#7
Posted 22 September 2004 - 02:20 PM
#8
Posted 22 September 2004 - 02:27 PM
Not to say the weren't available for less but these are catalog prices.
Of course I like the older price sheet from November 1, 1992 better
C Drums $345.00
L Drums $139.95
#9
Posted 22 September 2004 - 07:27 PM
#10
Posted 22 September 2004 - 08:10 PM
"A person may not manufacture, sell, offer for sale, purchase, receive, or transfer a detachable magazine that has a capacity of more than 20 rounds of ammunition for a firearm. Md. Criminal Law Code 4-305( B ). This section does not apply to a .22 caliber rifle with a tubular magazine. Section 4-305(a)."
Purchases in another state or shipping mail order to another state is outside of the scope of this law. Possession is explicity not listed.
Edited by DC Chris, 22 September 2004 - 08:13 PM.
#11
Posted 23 September 2004 - 08:07 AM
I did not even get past the addresses on the Kahr website before it went into never never land. I'll just wait until a group buy on this board takes shape.
#12
Posted 23 September 2004 - 08:22 AM
#13
Posted 23 September 2004 - 10:15 AM
I hate to be a hardass, but when a seller reinterprets the law and makes it more stringent, they are, in my opinion, as bad as the anti-gunners themselves. Your Chicago example is a perfect one. As an example, Delta Force will not send a magazine over 10 rounds to about five states, at least two of the states allowing 15s and 20's with no problem. I think NJ allows big mags if they're blocked to 10 rounds when used.
#14
Posted 23 September 2004 - 10:20 AM
QUOTE (fred @ Sep 23 2004, 10:15 AM) |
96, I hate to be a hardass, but when a seller reinterprets the law and makes it more stringent, they are, in my opinion, as bad as the anti-gunners themselves. Your Chicago example is a perfect one. As an example, Delta Force will not send a magazine over 10 rounds to about five states, at least two of the states allowing 15s and 20's with no problem. I think NJ allows big mags if they're blocked to 10 rounds when used. |
Sellers reinterpreting the law? Kieslers won't sell any ammo to New York, Illinois and a few other places.
F*ck them, their prices suck anyway,
#15
Posted 23 September 2004 - 10:35 AM
The fact is the true criminals are harder to catch and prosecute so the common people who make minor mistakes are treated as the real criminals.
I think I said that how I meant it.
#16
Posted 23 September 2004 - 10:41 AM
Balder
#17
Posted 23 September 2004 - 12:29 PM

#18
Posted 23 September 2004 - 11:06 PM
Problem is traitorous scumbags who would buy anyway- that is why we will probably not have much impact if we don't stick together. I for one stand against paying an unreasonable price ($300+) for a L drum and will not buy one at all-
Who is with me, we need thousands to tow the line.
#19
Posted 23 September 2004 - 11:20 PM
Kahr and others are selling at suggested retail, plus charging shipping.
Same with the firearm magazines the prices are inflated, or the suggested price.
If the guys here holding an FFL checked with their wholesaler they would find a better price, and offer a lower one pending the profit margin they need to have.
I agree Lionhart, we must keep a constant vigil, as the anti's are gearing up for another push.
#20
Posted 24 September 2004 - 07:31 AM