Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

New Thompson Accessorie


  • Please log in to reply
70 replies to this topic

#61 LIONHART

LIONHART

    Long Time RKI Member

  • Regular Group
  • 2785 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Thompsons of course. All Manufactures and Models.

Posted 08 December 2004 - 08:13 PM

Come one Ron, tell us how your really feeling! Care to share in a Pudding Skin? I was quite successful in reheating the Pudding Cups again, to create another layer of Skin. Of course I had to carefully mark each one, Reproduction with my Knife, seeing that these weren't the Originals. Oh well....
  • 0

#62 colt21a

colt21a

    Respected Member

  • Regular Group
  • 3480 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:arizona desert.
  • Interests:Whatever we can do in Life

Posted 09 December 2004 - 01:31 PM

okay my true feeling's i am glad somebody is making anything for any thing now....i went back to buying german g-43's and k-43's....and yep not as bad as thompson's....you can still hopefully find a minty almost in grease, rifle matched with complete original scope and mount for $5,000.00

wow thats 1980 thompson price's.....and yes there is g-43 k-43 greed also...{go shop for them}

and since i was lucky enough on my first buying spree.to find a rare one.per the book{hitler's garand's} only twelve known...

I'M HAPPY! now back to gordon....he's a great man would accept him as my brother anyday......and help's all collector's with nice stuff....have i ever made parts in my days of buying and selling? nope!!

did i ever wish i could have a actuator...or rear sight,or wood in much better shape? YES!

and every thompson guy i know out there.wants thee best he can afford..within reason...when i collected thompson's. fn- fal's,svd sniper's colt's 1911,single action's p-38's luger's, garands'.ak-47's ak-74's,belt feed's...i always tried to get the best of the best....and in alot of them new in crate or mint,or new in issued box was the best you could get...

even my mp-38 was mint and fg-42 years ago.

however one day it all come's to a end...no more mint stuff no more nice part's,no replacement's of anykind...or big buck's...

i just paid a guy $600.00 for six new mp-40 mags...

sound nut's??find new one's again....and sold four new patent date mags.to a good buddy on this board last week...find new one's again.....everything colt and military has gone bonker's....check out s.a.r.show price's...

i know i was there for 48 hour's looking...

all the classics are just about gone..a guy asked me at the show on his beater navy 28 a value....i told him truthfully i would have given him between $10,000.00 to $12,000.00 for it.he had told me at the show he had a half dozen offer's of over $15,000.00>and was waiting for $20,000.00........a 50% condition gun..crazy huh??

{ i gave him ten minute's or better of my time .no charge}now that's love for the stuff.wink!!

so if somebody now makes everything thompson so what???if i buy something i try and check it out the best i can...and i do ask other opinion's....and hope whom i'm asking know's more about it then i do...whatever the subject maybe.

if i decided to make a part whatever it would be for whatever gun.i would try and make it as exact as possible,mark it no way....i would sell it as a replacement of whatever it is....NOT ORIGINAL > but duplicate current made..

do collector's get duped?? yes everyday.....and i have 100 storie's on that subject..have i myself over the year's..not that i can remember...i have a keen eye for this stuff.and many book's and picture's.and i ask question's.and and not afraid to ask how did you buy this gun....

my latest purhase,i am asking to speak to the deceased last living son>

i am sure 20 years from now people will have the brush,box firing pins{whoop's}actuator's,case's..manual's and all..and think this might be original...and it might be a repo.???

will some care?/yes! will other's nope!

i am on the downslide in collecting...ya know 33 year's...do i still enjoy it?YES, the hunt.

however i do get tired of all the rehashing of collecting this and who did that and repro that and can't import that....

i just about know everybody in the bizz,that is worth knowing!

do i care if they know me or use me for my info..who care's..

it's all about the history,the magic.and that we can do this stuff.

maybe other collector's in everything else are even more emotional on this subject of marking's,and repro's and phony stuff..i'm not!

and if i ever did get burned >i would sell it and tell the other party what it is upfront,and what they are buying...

and if i ever did make a mistake on selling anything in my collection to somebody....the deal must have been darn good in their eye's..because i never got anything back.

{and thats a fact}

so let gordon be,and doug richardson,and numrich tommygun man.and the other's who sell this stuff... WHY!

because then some would be moaning that we can't find original's>why doe's somebody not make a repro??go figure!!

all the last collection of stuff i sold was new complete or original!and some said {not here}it looks to good to be original>i asked how long you been collecting???ANSWER under five year's:

my answer to that....you've got a long way baby! a very long way!

everybody have fun with this stuff.it's the history,and not the buck's.

at the sa.r. i saw the buck's,and really little history.except gordon's table's and his buddie's..merle,murray.doug,and tommyman.{did not get his name}

well enough ya-da ya-da..hope you old timers and youngblood's did not throw up reading this post....i think it equaled ohio phil's for filler...but not content.wink!!

take care all...ron
  • 0

#63 Poprivit

Poprivit

    Long Time Member

  • Regular Group
  • 122 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 09 December 2004 - 03:48 PM

FWIW. I bought a Colt SAA through the Single Action Shooting Society (SASS) a while back and after a year's wait, it came so badly out of time that I had to spend $125 to make it run. (The revolver had cost $1450 from Colt.) The grips look like they were fitted by a retarded ape with a hand file. The sight's so far off that the gun shoots 7 inches high at 30 yards.

It was about 20% of one of the Italian repros.

The interesting point, and one I still puzzle over, is that the Colt came with an Uberti parts catalog (Uberti builds Italian SAA repros). Now, what am I to beleve? Does Colt advise I use repro parts in my expen$ive SAA, or are THEY using Uberti parts?

Where does it all end? Do I own a REAL Colt, or what? blink.gif
  • 0

#64 colt21a

colt21a

    Respected Member

  • Regular Group
  • 3480 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:arizona desert.
  • Interests:Whatever we can do in Life

Posted 09 December 2004 - 04:09 PM

QUOTE (Poprivit @ Dec 9 2004, 03:48 PM)
FWIW. I bought a Colt SAA through the Single Action Shooting Society (SASS) a while back and after a year's wait, it came so badly out of time that I had to spend $125 to make it run. (The revolver had cost $1450 from Colt.) The grips look like they were fitted by a retarded ape with a hand file. The sight's so far off that the gun shoots 7 inches high at 30 yards.

It was about 20% of one of the Italian repros.

The interesting point, and one I still puzzle over, is that the Colt came with an Uberti parts catalog (Uberti builds Italian SAA repros). Now, what am I to beleve? Does Colt advise I use repro parts in my expen$ive SAA, or are THEY using Uberti parts?

Where does it all end? Do I own a REAL Colt, or what? blink.gif

however were you happy with the colt 1911a1 you bought from me?? thats the hard question. wink!!

yes everybody today is using other part's and whatever they can....even the m-16 series is full of other companies item's...put together at colt!! at least.........have a good holidays take care,ron
  • 0

#65 AZDoug

AZDoug

    Regular Member

  • Regular Group
  • 200 posts

Posted 09 December 2004 - 07:08 PM

The gun collecting biz/hobby is a very strange one.

it is about the only collectible that is worth more as an untouched original rusty pile of shit than in a professionally restored condition.

They restored the Mona Lisa, and the Sistine Chapel roof, which included adding new paint and stailizing the base. Are they now worth less, or considered non-original? Hell no.

Do you see people paying mega bucks on old clapped out 1964 Nova SS's that have all teh original parts? No, they pay the mega bucks for the retored Nova, which has it's share of new manufactured parts.

Only in guns do people look ata gun and say" that looks refinished, it is worthless now".

That is what i mean by relativity. on something, resto is OK and accepeted, on others it is not.

Doug
  • 0

#66 Arthur Fliegenheimer

Arthur Fliegenheimer

    Respected Member

  • Regular Group
  • 3456 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 09 December 2004 - 08:25 PM

AZ Doug,
But the curators of the Sistine Chapel are not passing off the Michelangelo roof as never having been maintained in order to keep it from eroding altogether. There is absolutely nothing more patently false that any restoration or preservation of firearms, swords, paintings, bronzes, leather, wood, etc is detrimental to the value of the item, if it is done by experts in their field, and if continued neglect means further deterioration and eventual worthlessness of said item. If any firearm is so pitted and rusted and completely devoid of any semblance of what it once was, then of course it is obligatory to save the item by refinishing it.

But again, the argument is not about sacrificing the repro part at the expense of the whole piece. It is the honesty about what transpired, when and why.

I have never seen so many convoluted and twisted analogies as to why it's OK to have counterfeit parts flooding the market. The truly confounding argument, "Who will care in 100 years anyway," is exactly the same one made by no name artists back in the 19th century, who copied the Masters and figured that time would blur the originals from the forgeries. It didn't take Nostradamus to invalidate that theory.

  • 0

#67 Zamm

Zamm

    Respected Member & Artist

  • Regular Group
  • 831 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Long Island, New York
  • Interests:Thompsons, and all their goodies!<br>Obsolete Victorian Photomechanical processes,<br>Etching, Engraving and all Printmaking,<br>Entomology, specializing in Coleoptera,<br>Arachnology, specializing in Theraphosidae.

Posted 09 December 2004 - 09:02 PM

A quick note from working in the art field.

Mr. Rembrandt made a lot of etchings in his time. These were steel
plates, coated with an acid resist paint, scratched with a needle and then etched with acid.
Ink is applied to the plate, wiped to stay in the lines, then transfered to a sheet of paper under pressure. Beautiful little things. And you can make more then one.
Fetch quite a handsome price nowaydays.

After his death, low and behold, the plates remained. The various estates controlling them re-printed them in what
is refered to as a "re-strike". These fetch quite a bit less money, but are still valuble for what they are.
In most cases, a re-strike has a identifiying mark, put there by the printer, inside the image margin,
or a stamp stating it is a re-strike, printed by so and so on the back.

What get's quite sticky, are the re-strikes that are not marked. Now these may have been re-struck over a hundred years ago... providence being lost by time, so, it's hard to tell if it's an oringinal ( okayed by Rembrandt himself), or something printed after he was dead.
Great Big difference in Money sad.gif
Many folks have bought a re-strike thinking it was an original (from both reputable and shady dealers and auction houses).

Then again, I personally know a fellow who bought a supposed "un-marked" re-strike Rembrandt self portrait at a used book store in London for about $200.00 only to find out later it was authentic, by an expert from the Art Institute of Chicago.
His $57,000.00 print is quite nice, and the price was right:)
A very sticky subject, indeed.
I guess it's " let the buyer beware" for me... If it seems like too good of a deal, it probably is.

Lionhart: I can't belive I've found someone else who actually harvests pudding skins!!!!
My wife thinks I'm nut's smile.gif I have gotten to the point of pouring the pudding onto cookie sheets, very thin, and coming up with yards of the stuff. Roll em up like crepes!
Zamm
  • 0

#68 LIONHART

LIONHART

    Long Time RKI Member

  • Regular Group
  • 2785 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Thompsons of course. All Manufactures and Models.

Posted 09 December 2004 - 10:09 PM

QUOTE
Lionhart: I can't belive I've found someone else who actually harvests pudding skins!!!!
My wife thinks I'm nut's  I have gotten to the point of pouring the pudding onto cookie sheets, very thin, and coming up with yards of the stuff. Roll em up like crepes!


Wow, what a fantastic idea Zamm! I made another batch early this afternoon, but tomorrow, I'm going to try your method. Thanks for passing this by. This board is great...
  • 0

#69 john

john

    Long Time RKI Member

  • Regular Group
  • 551 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Saint Paul, Minnesota

Posted 09 December 2004 - 11:24 PM

Well!
It's nice to know that some here (Lionhart and a few others) have enough common sense to know what the hell I am talking about.
Arthur, I guess you really told me, eh, buddy? Oh, and those big words....obviously you are waaaayyyyyy smarter than me. wink.gif BTW, I don't get any sort of "high" from meeting anybody in particular and for your info I met Gordon last summer in DC. The SAR show was the second time I've enjoyed his company. I like the man because he is (unlike some....) genuinely decent. I don't care for those who are so far into their own opinions that they can't ever entertain a notion that someone else MIGHT be right (not saying I am on this matter, but it won't make any difference to some anyway!) or might have a differing opinion than their own.
I guess that what we should do to make everyone here happy is to pass all manner of legislation to make sure scoundrels like Gordon never have the opportunity to make potential crooks out of the rest of us, right? (Hey Arthur! Ever see the Sci-Fi movie "Minority Report"? Bet you really liked that one, huh??)
Oh Yeah. As a matter of fact, let's make so damned many laws to protect everyone that we are forever hobbled by so much red tape and legalese that we will never ever think of doing something that might irk the moral fiber of those righteous few who would do our thinking for us. wink.gif
And the first new law could be the "Arthur Fleigenheimer Thompson Parts Counterfeit Protection Act". Just what we need. Politicians and Righteous wanna-bes making our decisions for us!!! That is one of the bad ideals that the founding Fathers fought the Revolution to prevent, isn't it?

Come on folks!

What I said was that we need to take care of ourselves. We certainly don't need someone else (Arthur,Philohio OR the Government) making all our decisions for us..............

Arthur, after all finally settled down after your last big rant a couple years ago, and having read many very intelligent posts from you since then, I was actually thinking that you might not be such a horses --- after all. But once again, time has proven me wrong!!
I won't make that mistake again!!

And for the rest who disagree with me, SORRY!! biggrin.gif As I said SEVERAL TIMES in my original post, These are just MY OPINIONS!! But everyone here is SOOOOOOO serious sometimes, and then there are those who would tell you that you are not entitled to your own opinions..... dry.gif

My original post started out as kind of a light-hearted rant that merely expressed my opinion, and I hoped this board still allowed that. But Arthur and a couple others really kinda pissed me off with their vitriolic posts that are seemingly or directly aimed at those of us who would dare tread on THEIR opinions....
Sorry if I offended anyone else.....

Arthur, even you are entitled to your opinion. I disagree with it completely. And I don't expect you to agree with mine. But it would be decent of you to honor the fact that I, too am entitled to my opinion. Or am I??

john
  • 0

#70 John Jr

John Jr

    Long Time RKI Member

  • Regular Group
  • 1956 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Mena, Arkansas, USA
  • Interests:Plenty

Posted 10 December 2004 - 12:09 AM

And now for the TRUTH:



























WHO GIVES A FUCK? laugh.gif
  • 0

#71 Arthur Fliegenheimer

Arthur Fliegenheimer

    Respected Member

  • Regular Group
  • 3456 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 December 2004 - 07:00 PM

QUOTE
The ONLY persons who are effected by unmarked Duplicates are those who profit from Thompson Greed.
Lionhart

You added two and two and came up with five. Since these bogus unmarked parts didn't hit the scene for Colt TSMG's until the firearm itself reached their $30K-$40K market value for the best examples, it is those who manufacture the un marked parts that tap into the so called "TSMG greed." Why else turn out, in SecondAmend's own words, "virtually identical" parts that wind up substituting missing, or broken original parts in these very same high dollar firearms where the allegedly unscrupulous owner doesn't fancy tell tale signs for these "substituted" parts.

Since NFA weapons are illegal in your state, your indifference, or rather preference for unmarked parts is innocuous enough, if not puzzling, since you don't have the weapon they plug into.

Again your rational that there is no difference between factory made parts for their own firearm and repro parts posing as factory made ones, now includes the bizarre notion that in order for the part to be correct and of the time period for the gun, it had to leave the factory with that part on it. This is patently absurd since we all know that all 1921 TSMG's did not have Cutts, or the original barrels that were fitted to the gun on the assembly line when customers wanted the second pattern Cutts fitted to the newly produced barrels that accommodated them. Not to mention the Auto- Ord's Navy actuators pilot/buffer/spring.

No one can guarantee that the wood on their TSMG is the exact one the firearm left the factory with. And the market value for these firearms isn't even concerned with that unprovable aspect of the firearm. And since the parts to the Colt TSMG are not numbered, naturally parts from other Colt TSMG's may have been substituted for the ones that the firearm left the factory with.

None of this has anything to do with those who would "allegedly" commit fraud by substituting unmarked Colt type parts posing as originals in a firearm that have nothing to do with the original gun manufacturer.

The substitution of NOS Savage/ AO parts in WWII TSMG's hasn't affected their value at all. No doubt these firearms have been rebuilt multiple times. But as long as they are made up of their NOS parts, then no harm no foul.

How can you compare a helmet, that may or may not have had a decal, or insignia on it ever, to a firearm that has to have the exact number of parts according to it's own designation? As long as the parts are from the manufacturer, then there is no reason to expect deception.

  • 0