Tom Hanks At It Again?
Posted 11 November 2004 - 10:47 PM
Philadelphia was an excellent, well-acted movie. I don't approve of the lifestyle but there's already too much hate in the world without me adding to it.
Posted 12 November 2004 - 12:04 AM
I don't hate fags, I hate what they do.
Posted 12 November 2004 - 05:33 PM
Posted 12 November 2004 - 10:12 PM
|QUOTE (SamG @ Nov 10 2004, 07:55 PM)|
|Ironic that he's a flaming liberal|
I don't think Tom Hanks is quite as liberal as most in hollywood although he certainly is liberal to some extent. He keeps alot of his political views to Himself. I admire him for his work with and for WWII veterans and that alone makes it tolerable for Me to watch his movies in spite of the fact I am certain We don't see eye to eye on many issues. Sylvester Stallone on the other hand is such a nutcase rabid hypocritical liberal a$$ that I will never watch another of his movies no matter how many guns he carries or how many bad guys he offs in his movies. Stallone is liberal slimeball of the first order. I will never forget his statement that the only way We are going to stop gun violence is to go door to door and search every house in America and destroy every gun found in possesion of the citizens! Zeig Heil! Stallone!
Posted 13 November 2004 - 11:56 AM
Posted 14 November 2004 - 08:18 AM
I think Hanks and Spielberg did a great service by bringing to the masses,
what the "Greatest Generation" went through. Not everyone has read Stephen Ambrose's great books...
It also gets me that just this veterans day, some local affiliates backed out of airing Private Ryan because of fear of offending
the FCC and getting finned. Cripes, that was what these guys were over there for.
|I don't hate fags, I hate what they do.|
And I don't hate rednecks, just how dumb they can be sometimes....
Jim, do you even know any so-called "fags"? Have you ever had a friend ravaged by this disease and then die wasted into nothing?
Aids is a virus, it has no morals... just ask anyone who has gotten it from tainted blood, by accident.
Posted 15 November 2004 - 12:56 AM
If he is, then it will likely be a classic production.
If not, then it will be another hollywood elephant, stifling full of glaring technical errors, so that no one who knows anything about it can actually enjoy it.
Here's hoping for Dye.
Posted 15 November 2004 - 02:52 PM
Yup, I'm sure we are way off topic now... But it still startles me how short sighted some folks are.
Aids in Africa is predominantly heterosexual, as I'm sure your daughter and husband can attest to.
That is some knoble work they are doing, my highest respect to them. They could be driving Ferrarri's over here,
but lucky for us, some people follow a deeper calling.
And so dear moderaters, I promise to go to the "rant" section if this thread keeps going down this road.
Posted 17 November 2004 - 12:32 AM
It's because they are totally depraved with their desire to have sex with as many people as they can and be as perverted as possible. Haven't you read in the papers that fags having "unprotected sex" with each other has been on the rise for years now? Why do you think that is? Reread the first sentence in this paragraph. They know the risks.
Oh, by the way Zamm,
Why is it whenever someone talks out about immoral behavior, people like you label them as uneducated "rednecks"? If your definition of a "redneck" is someone who holds to a simpler, more God-fearing lifestyle, than all I have to say is HEE-HAW!
Why am I dumb? because I talk out against homosexuality and I shouldn't because of the self-inflicted disease that goes along with it makes it a lifestyle that can't be criticized? You are the one that needs to think a little deeper my friend.
Why are you trying to put pity on them? because they have a very high chance to get AIDS? AIDS in the U.S. is, for the most part, very preventable, people need to stop screwing everbody they feel like. I've known/know plenty of fags, I live an hour north of Seattle!!
Posted 17 November 2004 - 12:39 AM
Posted 17 November 2004 - 04:30 PM
Eloquent, as usual.
By using the term "redneck", I was making a point about "stereotypes", such as your usage of the term "fag",
but being the pinhead you are,
it was moot.
Take it off list, my email is firstname.lastname@example.org
You wouldn't last 5 minutes in the South Bronx you ignorant fool...
Posted 17 November 2004 - 06:03 PM
Posted 17 November 2004 - 11:47 PM
Oooo! did I touch a nerve pointing out your inept spelling ability?
From the looks of your photo, YOU wouldn't last 5 minutes in the South Bronx without your Twinkies and Ho-Ho's!
I don't want to continue this discussion on this board or one on one. I've had my fun with you so let's just drop it.
Posted 18 November 2004 - 11:46 PM
Point 1: Dye was a Marine. The Army used different tactics in WW II. That's what killed "SPR" for me... and the fact that they wore BLACK boots. "BOB" was better, but there are still errors that can be found. Overall, the best of the recent WW II flicks.
Point 2: Tom Hanks was in a REALLY bad flick no one mentioned...and I can't remember the title. He played an American serving in the RAF in North Africa (complete with Eagle Squadron patches!) who falls for a native girl/woman. Not worth wasting a free rental coupon on.
Posted 19 November 2004 - 01:17 AM
Most of the stars had a clunker or two in their resumes. Even John Wayne had a howler called
"The Conquerer" where he played Genghis Khan !
Posted 19 November 2004 - 09:33 AM
Posted 19 November 2004 - 10:50 AM