
1921 Sold
#1
Posted 21 January 2005 - 10:10 AM
#2
Posted 21 January 2005 - 10:39 AM
But compared to L.J. Warren's #147 Colt TSMG priced at $42K, that has considerable wear, it was a bargain.
#3
Posted 21 January 2005 - 11:52 AM
#4
Posted 21 January 2005 - 02:23 PM
For the condition that #147 is in, the $7000, give or take, of accessories don't elevate a 80%-85% Colt TSMG to a $42K figure. There seems to be about $10K of value missing somewhere.
#5
Posted 21 January 2005 - 02:41 PM
#6
Posted 21 January 2005 - 02:49 PM
People with money who want something will spend what ever it takes to get it. And those who are lucky enough to own a Thompson now should be thanking their lucky stars that have such a nice investment that they can ACTUALLY use.
Thats my take on this whole silly thing.

#7
Posted 21 January 2005 - 03:35 PM
QUOTE (Arthur Fliegenheimer @ Jan 21 2005, 02:23 PM) |
Bruce, For the condition that #147 is in, the $7000, give or take, of accessories don't elevate a 80%-85% Colt TSMG to a $42K figure. There seems to be about $10K of value missing somewhere. |
Arthur
I am pleased to know that minds greater than mine put the same value on it. I would have bought the package at 32 or 33 at the oustide, but 42 was way too much.
Additionally, I thought 147 was an 80% gun. Although it was described to me as better than that, I chalk that up to subjective differences in evaluators.
#8
Posted 21 January 2005 - 04:35 PM
#9
Posted 21 January 2005 - 05:25 PM
#10
Posted 21 January 2005 - 05:30 PM
#11
Posted 21 January 2005 - 10:16 PM
#12
Posted 21 January 2005 - 11:16 PM

#13
Posted 22 January 2005 - 11:17 AM
ron
#14
Posted 22 January 2005 - 05:29 PM
