Legality Of Detachable Buttstock On Kahr?
Posted 20 March 2005 - 04:37 PM
I know I've seen this topic on the board before, but I couldn't turn it up with a search and I'm not sure if the expiration of the AWB affects it either, so I figured I'd ask. Sorry if this is a repeat!
I'm looking to modify my SA Kahr 1927A1 with one of those detachable buttstock kits. Are there any legal hurdles / roadblocks to doing this? I.e., is there a minimum length requirement that would be violated by such a change. Also, I'm SBR'ing it with a Form 1, so would the fact that it's now a NFA toy affect the legality of such a change? Thanks!
Posted 20 March 2005 - 04:44 PM
With the AWB sunset, it might have been a provision to ban "scary" features like removable buttstocks, but since the law is history it is a moot point.
I would think Lionhart or Damon could chime in with more educated answers, but since tommygunner.com has them for sale, I think its probably a good sign that you are okay.
Posted 20 March 2005 - 04:47 PM
Posted 20 March 2005 - 06:03 PM
Posted 20 March 2005 - 07:02 PM
Always has been a stupid aspect of the law.
Posted 20 March 2005 - 07:09 PM
Whether or not a firearm is an SBS/SBR is not strictly dependent upon the barrel length, but also upon the overall length. 18USC CH44 921(a)(6) and 921(a)(8) are the operative definitions. For an SBS, if the barrel is less than 18 inches or the overall length is less than 26 inches it is an SBS. For a rifle, the OAL is the same, but the barrel length needs to be at least 16 inches or else it is an SBR. Thus, you could have a rifle with a 16 inch barrel but an OAL of 20 inches and it would still need to be registered as an SBR. Secondly, under federal law the OAL is determined with the stock in its extended position and the barrel length is determined by measuring from the bolt face to the muzzle (see CFR 179.11 under "firearm" for how to measure a firerm's OAL/bbl length.)
As far as a semi-auto Thompson rifle, I have no idea what the OAL is either with or without a butt stock, but I'd assume that with a detachable stock that is detached it'd still have to meet the minimum OAL.
Lastly, the "assualt weapons' ban" was 18USC CH 44 922(v) which prohibited more than one evil feature. Even if the ban was still in effect (it is not) a detachable stock was not an evil feature...the law specifically said "folding or telescoping stock." For the record, none of the Thompson semi-auto rifles ever qualified as an "assault weapon" under 921(a)(30). "Assault weapons," as defined by 921(a)(30) had to have: A) a detachable magazine, and at least two "evil" features. The only "evil feature" the semi-auto thompson rifles ever had was a pistol grip.
Damn! OldFALGuy beat me to it!
Edited by Bill in VA, 20 March 2005 - 07:12 PM.
Posted 20 March 2005 - 07:37 PM
Posted 20 March 2005 - 08:30 PM
Edited by Sgt. Fox, 20 March 2005 - 08:30 PM.
Posted 20 March 2005 - 08:35 PM
Posted 20 March 2005 - 09:23 PM
as long as the barrel is 16", the Semi 27 will meet overall
Fed length requirement with the buttstock removed ( it's around 28 and 3/4" ).
So, go ahead, live a little and remove that stock on and off as quick as you like!
But do it now so it's nicley grandfathered in just in case of things to come
Posted 20 March 2005 - 10:16 PM
I was also thinking about the semi thompson pistol that can't be had WITH a stock or its an SBR- only alternative woudl be if the weapon wouldn't fire with the butt detached.
Posted 21 March 2005 - 07:31 AM