


http://www.jcdevine....on/class3_1.htm
http://www.jcdevine....on/class3_2.htm
Posted 28 April 2005 - 11:25 AM
Posted 28 April 2005 - 04:59 PM
Posted 29 April 2005 - 01:08 AM
QUOTE (PhilOhio @ Apr 28 2005, 11:56 PM) |
The gun looks pretty nice. Then I see that closeup of the left side of the grip frame, with all the deep pocking on the surface. It looks like it has been through the mill. In no way does this wear pattern match the wear pattern of the receiver. Do any of you know of some innocent way this could have happened, without the thing being some sort of bastardized parts gun? Everything I have ever learned tells me that dramatically different wear patters on parts of the same gun usually spells ripoff. And when the thing is offered by that paragon of virtue Uncle Joe...red flags everywhere. The wood looks nice, and the fins appear right, although I am not the Colt expert. Arthur, help us out. John Jr., could this be the Colt of your dreams, worth mortgaging the house? ![]() Might a $27,000 winning Joe Devine auction bidder be getting himself kahr'd in several orifices simultaneously, or would he snag a thing of beauty to treasure forever? ![]() Is this the one to grab at all costs? Or would the winning bidder actually need that parts box to store the suppositories necessary for treating the after effects of having been kahr'd strenuously? |
Posted 29 April 2005 - 02:09 AM
Posted 29 April 2005 - 06:45 AM
Posted 10 May 2005 - 04:56 PM
Posted 11 May 2005 - 03:07 PM
Posted 11 May 2005 - 10:42 PM
Posted 12 May 2005 - 09:00 AM
QUOTE (PhilOhio @ May 12 2005, 08:42 AM) |
That's such a great picture that I've been trying to think of some honorary title the gentleman could be given, |
Posted 12 May 2005 - 09:05 AM
Posted 12 May 2005 - 02:56 PM
Posted 15 May 2005 - 03:29 PM