Does that mean that someone in the military is digging up some obscure policy somewhere, and trying to enforce one gun at a time?
Army Wants Tsmg Back!
Started by
kyle
, May 23 2005 07:37 PM
22 replies to this topic
#21
Sgt
-
- Board Benefactor
-
- 2047 posts
Long Time RKI Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:Eastern TN
- Interests:Militaria, Chess, Tools, Sherlock Holmes, Printmaking, UFOs, Ghosts, Electronics, Comic Books, Long walks in the rain, with my Savage 1928a1. (just kidding on the last one; it doesn't have to be raining) -- Ralph
Posted 22 September 2005 - 07:15 AM
#22
1921A
-
- Board Benefactor
-
- 634 posts
Respected Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:Orlando, FL
Posted 22 September 2005 - 07:24 AM
FYI
Check out the October 2005 American Rifleman article on page 122. Reference: DOD unsuccessfully going after legally owned former U.S. military NFA weapons. NRA offered legal assistance to NFA owners and DOD backed down - seems related to this topic.
1921A
Check out the October 2005 American Rifleman article on page 122. Reference: DOD unsuccessfully going after legally owned former U.S. military NFA weapons. NRA offered legal assistance to NFA owners and DOD backed down - seems related to this topic.
1921A
#23
Ltcboy
-
- Regular Group
-
- 83 posts
Member
- Gender:Male
Posted 22 September 2005 - 06:49 PM
I cannot understand why they would go after Garands and Carbines when the DCM and CMP have been selling them for years. Something isnt kosher
