While others on this board have remarked on the negative connotations of your gunboard moniker, it is your privilege to use any name. Too bad you do not extend the same freedom of expression to others.
Does the following quote look familiar to you?
|I see postings all the time on the Thompson board from ivory tower elitists looking down their noses at WH thompsons. Screw that noise .|
Essentially, an "elitists," as defined by you, is anyone who characterizes a WH as a repro/replica, or criticizes their shortcomings, and, therefore, meets the criteria for exclusion from Subguns.
Since I see numerous posts on Subguns regarding complaints about the WH, you will be busy in your snitch capacity getting others banned.
Posted By: BrianG
Date: 1/19/06 18:30
|Good point about ignoring snobs, but the WH Thompson isn't very well made. |
I used to own a Colt made 21, that one would eat just about any ammo (except
S&, this includes cheapie lead round nose reloads. The wood was finely crafted
& the sight was usable to get hits out to 100 yards.
The WH only digests FMJ, the wood looks like it was sawed out of a plank &
the sight aperture falls down after a few rounds. It's OK, I can make do, but
an improvement would be nice.
I suppose I could fix up the WH for better performance, but that might be only
a partial solution. Using one of these parts kits might be a complete solution.
I might buy a parts kit just to have, I've never seen these so nice before.
Yet, the irony is that Tallahassee Ted's comments, and even Brian G's, make my WH replica appellation pale in comparison. By the non-specified Subgun regs, Ted and Brian G over qualify for excommunication from that board for their own indelicate remarks?
Also, how would you know if I were banned from Subguns? Did Bowers inform you of this personally?