Edited by philasteen, 23 March 2006 - 08:11 AM.
Thompson C&r Status Determination Revoked
Posted 22 March 2006 - 11:01 PM
Posted 23 March 2006 - 07:40 AM
Posted 23 March 2006 - 08:08 AM
That is what I too perceive may be happening. I thought the original request from TCA was for just what we term the West Hurley Auto-Ordnance Thompson’s. I assume (but do not know for a fact) that TCA wanted to keep the initial request simple and not introduce all the Thompson variations known by Thompson collectors into the decision making process. It sounded like a pretty good strategy in that you could always build on any success for the next request. Only time will tell what is actually going on. I think it positive BATFE has actually tried to telephone the President of TCA on this matter.
Posted 23 March 2006 - 09:18 AM
I just want to plagarize the best parts and apply them to my MG.
Back on point, I've got a reweld (Non C&R) Savage (sitting at PK"s right now) and I sure hope that ATF doesn't change the C&R definition from their original letter.
Posted 23 March 2006 - 10:20 AM
....the end-result is that BATF does not want to receive....and have to answer to why "ALL legally registered Class III Weapons made before the 1986 MG-Ban cannot be C&R due to the increases in their value".
Just my observations from trying to get "origainal" AK-47 series rifles added into the C&R List.........and before I hear it.....the C&R List gives the requirements/procedures for a person(s) to "request-a-Determination to be made to add a weapon/series of weapons into the C&R List"......it does not say that weapons 50-years or older are "automatically-added".......or the C&R List would already have them listed by date = "Made prior to ______"...along with a long list of other weapons.
Posted 23 March 2006 - 10:39 AM
|QUOTE (Blanksguy @ Mar 23 2006, 10:20 AM)|
| it does not say that weapons 50-years or older are "automatically-added".......or the C&R List would already have them listed by date = "Made prior to ______"...along with a long list of other weapons.|
I was aways under the impression that if you could prove a gun was manufactured more than 50 yrs ago, it is a C&R whether it's on the list or not. Are you suggesting this is not the case?
Posted 23 March 2006 - 01:34 PM
Posted 23 March 2006 - 02:44 PM
Questions for you sir.....
1: Whay are military Bolt-Action Rifles listed in the other sections along with the other 100 or so weapons that were made over 50-years ago?...and many weapons listed as "made prior to 1946"?
2: Why does the NFA Brance use the current C&R List (with "up-dates") to help approve Transfers to people with C&R Licenses?
The "at least 50-years-old" applies to a "criteria" that allows for the submission of the request for Determination for C&R Status".....not a "blanket-approval" for anything over 50-years old. Such as the criteria to be met during submission of "value"....and/or "rarity",.....and/or "association to a Historic-person or Historic-battle"...............and/or the "manufactured at least 50-years prior to current date".
Not to try to egg you on..........but can you tell me where (page) in the C&R List you are reading that "Any weapon manufactured at least 50-years ago/50-years old is automatically added to the C&R List".....or "is automatically determined to be a Curio & Relic".
Please educate me so that I will be better able to deal with BATF Tech. Branch during my submissions.
Posted 23 March 2006 - 06:12 PM
Who knows "why" the ATF does a lot of the things they do?
Bill in VA's link seems to shed alot of light on the subject and it's good-n-nuff for me.
Posted 23 March 2006 - 07:43 PM
|QUOTE (PhilOhio @ Mar 23 2006, 10:53 AM)|
|If it's 50 years and one day old, it's C&R. Period.|
I thought this was just one part. The other part is that it has been deemed to have played an important role in history and not just age.
Posted 23 March 2006 - 11:12 PM
For TD – You are correct; Carol didn’t have enough information available to ask about other variations. I’m sure that she would have included them in the request if she had reliable production quantities. If they are available, let her know and she’ll use that information in her discussions with Mr. Nixon.
All - Carol did get to speak to Mr. Nixon the other day. The BATFE told Carol that the reason for their action was that letter had not been "Fully Vetted". Due to some mix-up, the BATFE legal office didn't complete their review of the document before Mr. Nixon signed it and sent it out. Mr. Nixon told her that he anticipated it would take ~60 days for the review and so Carol is expecting a reply in May.
Carol teaches middle school and this is a busy time for her with grades and the annual 8th grade Shakespeare play. She has called Mr. Nixon with a follow-up question or two but since their first conversation; they haven't been able to connect.
OK those are all the facts -- the following is my personal opinion only:
The BATFE would not have drafted a letter approving this request unless they planned to do just that. So unless this opens the door to all pre-86 MGs as C&R guns I expect that the final result will be an affirmative answer. They may well change the reason for saying yes but the end result will be the same. I also don’t think that they will change from all TSMG to just West Hurley M28s – Again this part is my opinion.
Posted 24 March 2006 - 08:50 AM
As set out in the regulations (27 CFR 178.11), curios or relics include firearms which are of special interest to collectors by reason of some quality other than is associated with firearms intended for sporting use or as offensive or defensive weapons. To be recognized as curios or relics, firearms must fall within one of the following categories:
1.) Firearms which were manufactured at least 50 years prior to the current date, but not including replicas thereof;
2.) Firearms which are certified by the curator of a municipal, State, or Federal museum which exhibits firearms to be curios or relics of museum interest; and
3.) Any other firearms which derive a substantial part of their monetary value from the fact that they are novel, rare, bizarre, or because of their association with some historical figure, period, or event. Proof of qualification of a particular firearm under this category may be established by evidence of present value and evidence that like firearms are not available except as collector's items, or that the value of like firearms available in ordinary commercial channels is substantially less.
Posted 25 March 2006 - 01:59 AM
I’ve printed this letter out and will show it to the next knucklehead who tells me they have a ATF letter on something, as if it’s engraved in stone for all eternity…
Posted 02 March 2007 - 05:16 PM
Posted 02 March 2007 - 07:07 PM
As the WH 28 is transferable as is, there may be low priority to the C&R request evaluation.
Posted 02 March 2007 - 10:11 PM