Jump to content

chewy56

Regular Group
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

chewy56 last won the day on April 15 2020

chewy56 had the most liked content!

About chewy56

Recent Profile Visitors

1712 profile views

chewy56's Achievements

New Member

New Member (1/5)

1

Reputation

  1. Dalbert, With that SN number and the Detonics. Assoc. stamp won't this be more in line with a Mark I production cycle? Especially since it might have the "pat. pend." inscription too??
  2. By the way, have just procured 4 more with the lowest serial number being 2295 or (295) since the 1st production models had 2000 added to the serial number thus 2295. At least my research indicates that. So almost to 30 CM's and 4 pocket 9's.
  3. Thanks guys. I am beginning to form the same opinion as my research has not proven any other conclusion. Although I do believe the original Detonics company/engineers did contract to AMT for some lowers they were not label as such. I will need to check the serial number under the slide to see what it says. If there is a serial number than it will leave only one conclusion and that is a rebuild. Since none of the companies Detonics bought parts from or contracted with for parts is still in business today or for that matter kept very good records (cause it was not really required back then) my research has hit a dead end.
  4. Hi folks, I am a collector of Detonic's having now procured about 25 of them. All from Mark 1's to mark VII's and a couple of Service Masters. Pocket 9's included. But I have never come across this type of Detonics. It is a upper slide marked Detonics and the lower is an AMT receiver SN A01xxxx. So my research has not been very fruitful so I need to rely on you experts to help me ID this as either a true Detonics or a rebuild. Chewy56
  5. Can u post a photo or two of this so we can help you with the info?
×
×
  • Create New...