Jump to content

Pet project…semi auto K….


Recommended Posts

I needed a “me” project….so I’m gonna build (or attempt to build) a semi auto SBR Swedish K. I have enough parts to build one complete (short an ejector and complete barrel shroud for a second) got the tubing in today (which I only needed 13.25” and had to buy 3 ft) I’m not sure when I’ll get to start on it, but I’ll take pictures of the process. I’m excited and nervous as to how the receiver tube machining will go. Going to put it in my indexer on the CNC mill to do that. It’ll be an interesting learning curve as my primary business is building HK clone guns….if all goes well perhaps I’ll branch out and make some K SBR’s and put them on the market as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are some pictures of today’s progress…the receiver prints I have are for an SMG spec tube…didn’t realize this until I had the receiver tube in the bench…the cocking handle slot needs to be machined closer to the ejection port. I have to do the following:

Lengthen the cocking handle slot, cut the back end off to length, machine in the tail cap lock notches, modify the sear height pin so the sear sits higher in the tube, machine the magazine opening wider (since I’m using semi auto spec tube/thicker side wall) and then it should be time to weld it all up. I’ll post more pics when I can get back to this. Took the day and decided to tinker for a few hours while I had the chance. 

IMG_1394.jpeg

IMG_1393.jpeg

IMG_1392.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I’m using an Indianapolis Ordnance semi auto bolt group in this. They didn’t have any tubes in stock and they won’t sell the template only so I’m doing a tube on my own. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Got Uzi said:

Here are some pictures of today’s progress…the receiver prints I have are for an SMG spec tube…didn’t realize this until I had the receiver tube in the bench…the cocking handle slot needs to be machined closer to the ejection port. I have to do the following:

Lengthen the cocking handle slot, cut the back end off to length, machine in the tail cap lock notches, modify the sear height pin so the sear sits higher in the tube, machine the magazine opening wider (since I’m using semi auto spec tube/thicker side wall) and then it should be time to weld it all up. I’ll post more pics when I can get back to this. Took the day and decided to tinker for a few hours while I had the chance. 

IMG_1394.jpeg

IMG_1393.jpeg

IMG_1392.jpeg

Holy moly Got Uzi! You are a feisty dude for sure, but nobody can doubt your talent! Great work, excellent detail. 
 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well thank you. I discovered a few other little details that the semi auto receiver needs a few more little details. Also had to modify the sear restriction height pin so the sear sits higher in the tube. Hopefully this weekend I can finish the tube machining then tack weld it together and try it out before finish welding 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If and thats a big IF this goes well, I might build a few of these as SBR's and offer them to the public.  There aren't any on the market at this point so why not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Funny you ask about this today….I have been tinkering with the K project this week off an on when I get overwhelmed finding homes for stuff…took it out and test fired it today-shot well but was having trigger reset issues…came back to the shop and found the disconnector notch was dragging on the sear when trying to reset. 
 

Took off .030ish the tip of the hook and made the hook deeper by said .030ish. I also reprofiled the side and radius of the disconnect hook as well. It works perfectly on the bench now so I’ll test fire it again in the morning. 
 

This process I discovered that the receiver drawings I have are for a Full Auto spec tube and I was making a semi auto tube (more on this later) and with this I discovered that the Indy Ord bolt handle is in a different location (rotation angle wise) from that of the original K handle. I had to machine a plug, press it into the bolt body, then machine an offset hole into the plug (and into the body) followed up by machining a custom bolt handle to put it all together with.

Now as long as the test fire goes well tomorrow morning, I plan to come back, mask, blast and paint it “Swedish K Green” 

This build is NOT for the faint of heart of for those who are not mechanically skilled or understanding of gunsmithing. Not trying to sound superior or talk down to anyone, just giving fair warning. I can honestly say that at this point I have 35-40 hours in this gun over all and selling on the open market for $5,000-$6,000 is where they would be. 

IMG_1600.jpeg

IMG_1601.jpeg

IMG_1602.jpeg

IMG_1603.jpeg

IMG_1604.jpeg

IMG_1605.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glorious update!!!  I am definitely curious to hear more. I have seen and heard that the Indianapolis Ordnance kit places the handle at a slightly different angle. They do that as a denial bar to keep a FA bolt in an SA tube. Ergo, their handles match their SA tubes. 
 

I am curious why you chose to fill the large gaps with weld instead of filler pieces. Also, do you plan to machine the weld where the tube meets the sides? I’d like to hear more about the trigger setup. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The tube ID is also smaller so a standard K bolt won’t fit inside either. The semi auto bolt body is roughly .100 smaller than the standard K bolt. Thats the major denial block. The angle is somewhat of a “wtf” moment when you can’t get a tune from them and using specs you dug up from different sources. I’m working on a new set of prints for the semi tube and a new process sheet for order for the operations. 
 

I welded the gap instead of using a filler piece only because I wanted to play with my welder and test settings since I’m in my new shop. The amperage settings indeed are different now that I’m in town vs being in the country. 
 

I ground the weld seam to blend it in where the lower section meets the tube. I’m going to look at it again today to see if I like the results of that. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/18/2025 at 1:18 PM, Got Uzi said:

If and thats a big IF this goes well, I might build a few of these as SBR's and offer them to the public.  There aren't any on the market at this point so why not?

I think they'd sell great!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Test fired it today and it ran great. Might need to tweak the extractor spring as it’s super stiff. It does like 115 gr as it doesn’t have enough “umf” to get the extractor to snap over the rim causing it to OOB. Switched to 124 gr and it ran flawlessly…well after I realized I also had a bad mag in the mix LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Rekraps said:

I think they'd sell great!

That’s why I want to get busy with making receivers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m looking at kit costs and working on the final total with parts, labor, and so on. Kit prices are going to be a big factor in the over all cost, not to mention consistency of getting said kits. 
 

I guess the question is, how serious are you in doing this USMCsean? No offense meant by this but you talk like you want to make receivers but do you have the equipment and an 07/02 to do all this or were you planning to farm out the work and just be the investor on it? The other obstacle of these is once the initial void is filled, they will slow down as most won’t want to spend the money. It’s the same thing that happened with the DK MP38’s. When the first run was sold out and void was filled, they became something people wished upon a star to have. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No offense taken. At this moment, I am looking at making the sheet metal receiver shell, for lack of a better phrase. Depending on how well this goes, i’ll see what happens next. 

Edited by USMCsean
Spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/2/2025 at 4:21 PM, Got Uzi said:

Test fired it today and it ran great. Might need to tweak the extractor spring as it’s super stiff. It does like 115 gr as it doesn’t have enough “umf” to get the extractor to snap over the rim causing it to OOB. Switched to 124 gr and it ran flawlessly…well after I realized I also had a bad mag in the mix LOL

GUzi,

Can you expound on the out of battery (OOB) discharge.  The factory springs are really stiff.  It's hard to believe that after so many years in service, it's a problem that hasn't been solved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

It didn’t fire out of battery, the bolt was out of battery/aka not closed as the extractor didn’t lock into the case rim. 

Edited by Got Uzi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got Uzi,

Got it.  The orig. extractor springs are really stiff.  

I spoke w a Swedish officer, and they were having a problem with out of battery discharges during training.  Didn't happen often, if fact very few, but when the gun fired before the bolt was fully down, brass shards spewed out, and it scared soldiers.  The issue was pebbles are other debris getting into the open action while crawling through the woods.  When fired, the pebble would get between the bolt and cartridge, hitting the primer before the bolt was fully down.  They started using brass catchers during training, even combat training, to prevent anything getting into the open action.  For actual combat the catchers were dropped.

Joe

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...