Jump to content

1928 west hurley 22's observations


Recommended Posts

I have seen 4 different varieties of bolt used in the 1928 west hurley 22 machine guns.

 

1.  An actual hammer and moving firing pin basically like a .45 acp thompson.

2.  Fixed firing pin (machined or possibly welded steel) on the bottom of the bolt

3.  Fixed firing pin on the top of the bolt face that is pinned in place

4.  Flush fit, no actual firing pin.  The bolt crushes the whole case rim which pops the primer.

 

3 and 4 never work well in my experience, and are the ones that I have modified the most to function.  I follow the pattern of number 2.

Number 3 with the firing pin on the top of the bolt face has problems as the round gets caught sliding up into place as it chambers.

The gun can take the 30 ceiner mags with adaptor, the pps50 modufied drums, and the 22 insert 45 acp magazines.  

They will not work with the blackdog magazines.

 

Also the magazines for the 1927A3 are the same except the fit is 1/10 height difference.  (This can be adjusted if needed).

 

Bad fitting extractors are common.  Also rough chambers can be encountered also.  I had one gun here that the inner steel barrel liner had slipped forward thus the headspace was long and you didnt get a primer pop.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Thanks, Dan, for this information.  We are lucky to have you documenting this, which should prove helpful to someone in the future.  Your observations will help us better understand why the .22 WH Thompsons have varied reputation for reliability.

David

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I received a handwritten communication that a 5th variation occurs.    A small piece of metal is fixed into the barrel right at the chamber rim to cause a primer hit on the front/top edge of the rim when pushed home by a flat faced bolt.  So a number 4 (flat faced bolt) but an enhanced chamber.  The idea is intriguing enough to perhaps try building an open bolt full auto that functions that way.  

Edited by deerslayer
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/9/2025 at 8:40 AM, dalbert said:

Thanks, Dan, for this information.  We are lucky to have you documenting this, which should prove helpful to someone in the future.  Your observations will help us better understand why the .22 WH Thompsons have varied reputation for reliability.

David


This website is a fantastic source of information.

I actually do not know that much about Thompsons.  I'm continuously amazed at how much information the members here know and share.

Also, you guys are very sober-minded about digging up new facts, as opposed to pushing favorite opinions.  It's not common to find a large group of collectors that have that skeptical, careful, information-seeking attitude. 

A lot of people out there resist new information if it contradicts their existing knowledge.  Almost like it is an affront to their expertise.  I rarely see that attitude here.

Well, done guys.  You are the gold standard.

 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...