1921AC Thompson listed on Sturm...

[Cincylance]

I'm surprised that a discussion about this Thompson hasn't already showed up on the boards. It is listed on Sturmgewehr for $50k and is advertised as being all-original and correct. It was originally listed at $65k. To my novice eyes, it appears correct. Some experts I've talked with suspect all may not be as it appears. It is also listed on Gunbroker.

https://www.sturmgewehr.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42259-very-clean-colt-thompson-1921-50000/#comment-149437
https://www.gunbroker.com/item/1136203943

What is the general opinion from members of Colt Thompson #7809 #7849?
 

Edited November 19, 2025 by Cincylance

[Dpedersen]

Its actually NO. 7849. It is also listed on gunbroker with a lot more pictures with better detail. Although there are a lot of pictures, pictures don't always show the best of everything and I would recommend if interested in this gun for purchase, actually go do an in person inspection before forming an opinion. Don't forget to take Tom's guide book with you! For that kind of money, an in person inspection is worth it.

[Cincylance]

Typo on my part (now fixed in post above) and I did have the GB auction link, you must have missed it.

I was in the market but bought a different one. 

Just curious what the general consensus is on #7849.

[Dpedersen]

Like you, I dont really see much wrong with it. I am no expert though, not as well versed as those that are. One thing that kinda catches my eye is the compensator pin appears to be flattened on the left side?? Could be the pictures though. But if so why??? Appears that finish on the compensator, barrel, and frame match, and witness line on barrel and frame line up. Why remove the original compensator??? But again, could just be the photo/light/angle not showing it correctly. 

Edited November 19, 2025 by Dpedersen

[Cincylance]

Bumping this top the top in an effort to get opinions from the experts. Does anyone see any red flags with this beautiful Colt Thompson? Thanks!

[Colt Chopper]

Agree with Dpedersen on the compensator pin, The pics are not the best.

Butt stock appears to have a small crack at the butt plate, and no clear picture of the anchor stamp. the top (inside) of the trigger frame appears to have quite a bit of wear compared to the external finish which has virtually no scratch marks indicating trigger components removal. Unusual for a PD gun.

I would definitely do an in person inspection with a good magnifying glass before I would purchase. Also checking the barrel for any rings or issues.

Just my 2 cents

[anjong-ni]

Nothing sells an expensive  product like covering the photos with "watermarks"....Phil

[Merry Ploughboy]

1 hour ago, anjong-ni said:

Nothing sells an expensive  product like covering the photos with "watermarks"....Phil

IIRC, the watermarking of pricey guns that were for sale became rather common after the internet became a common advertising medium.  Scammers would swipe photos from legitimate ads and use the photos to sell 'vapor ware'.  At the time, at least one state that I know of did not permit out of state customers the benefit of suing or otherwise pursue recovery of lost funds.  Now most, if not all, states have 'long arm statutes' that do provide for out of state parties to sue in state parties.

MHO, YMMV, etc.

[Merry Ploughboy]

Conspicuous by its absence is any photo showing the nickel plated oil bottle that came with the gun when new, and was stored inside the stock.

MHO, YMMV, etc.