JJX Posted August 31, 2016 Report Share Posted August 31, 2016 Hello All I had a 16" bbl 1927 in the late 80's. It felt awkward and unbalanced to me, so I did not keep it very long.Recently I saw an ad for one with the aluminum receiver and it got me thinking that might be a good SBR.Do those have any drawbacks or problems? Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadDogDan Posted September 1, 2016 Report Share Posted September 1, 2016 (edited) About 8 or 10 years ago I purchased the aluminum recovered 1927 with the intension of SBR'ing it. I shot it while my Form1 was being approved. After only 250 - 300 rounds the receivers stretched and the upper to lower fit became very sloppy. So bad that I had a ton of malfunctions. I had BATFE amend the registry to show it still a title 1 gun as I never purchased the 10.5" barrel for it. I later sold it for $250 more then what I paid so even with the loss of the tax stamp I still came out $50 ahead and the person that purchased it knew the loose upper to lower fit but wanted it anyway. Bottom line is I would not touch the aluminum 1927 again. That said I purchased an all steel 1927 to SBR it. My stamp came in a couple of weeks ago and I am having a 10.5" 1921 style barrel made from a company called Thompson Barrels. They make barrels to Colt specs in any style you want (finned, no fins, square fins, radius fins, etc). Thompsons were never very ergonomic and weighed a ton but that is what you put up with if you want a piece of history. Edited September 7, 2016 by MadDogDan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterB Posted September 1, 2016 Report Share Posted September 1, 2016 About 8 or 10 years ago I purchased the aluminum recovered 1927 with the intension of SBR'ing it. I shot it while my Form1 was being approved. After only 250 - 300 rounds the receivers stretched and the upper to lower fit became very sloppy. So bad that I had a ton of malfunctions. I had BATFE amend the registry to show it still a title 1 gun as I never purchased the 10" barrel for it. I later sold it for $250 more then what I paid so even with the loss of the tax stamp I still came out $50 ahead and the person that purchased it knew the loose upper to lower fit but wanted it anyway. Bottom line is I would not touch the aluminum 1927 again. That said I purchased an all steel 1927 to SBR it. My stamp came in a couple of weeks ago and I am having a 10" 1921 style barrel made from a company called Thompson Barrels. They make barrels to Colt specs in any style you want (finned, no fins, square fins, radius fins, etc). Thompsons were never very ergonomic and weighed a ton but that is what you put up with if you want a piece of history.I couldn't agree more. Steel is the way to go. Hey, you seem to know your stuff. Can you chime in over on this thread?http://www.machinegunboards.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=19835&hl= Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now