M95M

Not an IT guy by any means. Will be interested in the scope of the "explanation" or if one is offered.

BD, same here but when I sent an email to the webmaster based on the 404 error code messsage I got a bounce back from the email server saying not a vaild address email address. They must have had a major server melt down. You could ask Oldman to talk to the frog and see what is going on. It sure would be nice to know one way or another. V/R Ed

I echo ELR Researcher on the FCSA. There are a few guys that have gotten better results than I listed. I'm assuming you are shooting prone with a bipod. The gun is not the easiest to "control" at only 22 lbs. Nature point of aim and follow through are critical for any semblance of consistency.

The gun, at least mine, is 1.25 MOA under the BEST of conditions and 1.75 is more realistic as a goal if you are talking 1000 yard (competition?). I think the best 5 shot group I ever had was 11.25" The gun could shoot 15 - 18" groups with some degree of consistency. I'm talking AMAX as I never could get solids to work. Also, check your throat. I ended up seating out to 5.75" COAL. If you want to shoot magazine length be happy with a 2 - 2.5 MOA gun. Because of the way the upper attaches to lower (pins and lugs) try setting up on a longer range target and dry fire the gun and watch the movement of the scope reticle. My gun consistently drops the cross hair from the x ring to the bottom of the 8 ring. That's 12" at 1000. Whether it is that extreme with a loaded round under lock up I have no idea but it shows the gun is inherently "loose" by design. That gun was made for a specific purpose and the ease of take down is a detriment to accuracy. You should definitely be able to get it to shoot below 2 MOA if you work a little with AMAX and H50BMG. I had mine out past a mile this fall and managed to hit 22" steel frequently enough to have fun. V/R Ed