Jump to content

Mixed serial number on Type 99 LMG, is it common or rare ?


Recommended Posts

I just picked up a Type 99 from someone who brought it from Ohio Ordnance  and it has been converted to 7.62/.308 with three different main serial numbers among the three major components. 

The upper receiver has serial # 13065,  Kokura Hitachi in April 1944

The barrel is Serial # 3108, made in Dec, 1941

The lower receiver and the bolt carrier group have the same serial # of 9343

The rest of the components like the charging handle, dust cover, bolt carrier locking block, and scope all have different serial numbers.

Is this common or rare for a mix party like this one ?  It also has this marking on the receiver "HR Guns, P C FL" .   Is it an import mark ?

Pictures  https://postimg.cc/gallery/ms4qFHxF

Edited by angelmonk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is quite likely it was a deactivated dewat.  I did not think being how rare Type 99 supposed to be that there are enough part kits to put a functional gun together.  As this gun has parts that come from at least 6 different "original guns". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

The vast majority of Type 96 and Type 99 Japanese machineguns were registered as DEWATs. They were allwall hangers at the time, but REWATed at some time in the future when the value came up. You can find guns that were never DEWATed but these are the exceptions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no doubt that some of those parts from your gun were most likely put on in the Field by the Japanese, but I do agree with most above that most of the parts were put on by HR to make a functional 99 LMG. Given the many mixed serial numbers. The Japanese Were known to do this but what they do is they would take anything and everything off one gun for cannabilization, then fit it on to the one they were trying to make a running gun out of. Espically when being cut off on the Islands by US Army, Marine, and Naval Personal. I have a 96 that is a mixed gun, but was able to track the history on it and confirm it being a Guadalcanal bringback and be a gun that had three different guns used to make it Run!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Do Dewat guns usually have the receivers cut and "REWAT" guns usually have sign of wielding?  Attached are two pictures for your opinion on whether the receiver has been re-wielded.  GEJ, how did you manage to track the history of your Type 96 ?

B08.thumb.JPG.b8ce6b9ea26bdf1b00063893c98a5b63.JPGB07.thumb.JPG.6b93479303fd7289cc6280fb2825d82f.JPGB04.thumb.JPG.d6de34add04910990327484211e35e1e.JPGB03.thumb.JPG.874c19f9494b8fc07a354081bb04e193.JPG

 

 

 

 

B12.JPG

Edited by angelmonk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I'm in a similar situation with a documented USMC bring-back Type 96 (see attached paperwork).  What is immediately of interest with the paperwork is the date when the Marine's C.O. authorzed the bring back: March 15, 1944.  This date being about 1.5 years before the war ended in the PTO, we immdiately know the gun is not a much more common post-war pickup out of a pile of surrendered weapons by US forces on Occupation Duty in Japan.  Rather, the war was very much 100% "on" at the time this Marine was mailing his war trophies home.   If you then do some research of his unit (part of the Second Marine Division) and look at the unit's history, you quickly see that the only logical place the gun could originate from is the battle of Tarawa.  Additional research will show that a small contingent of the Second Marine Division got left on Tarawa for post-battle "cleanup" and "security detail" type work, while the majority of the Division got shipped back to Hawaii for R&R.  So, Corporal Wilbur McCarter (the Marine who shipped the Type 96 back home to his wife in Phoenix, AZ) was apparently one of the unlucky few who were ordered to stay on Tarawa post-battle.  Lucky for us history buffs, however, is that Corporal McCarter salvaged this Type 96 from the post-battle mess; got it lawfully shipped home; and that the paperwork has survived with the gun so that we are able to figure out the gun's history.  In my experience it is highly unusual to have this sort of history kept together with a PTO bring-back NFA item.  Corporal McCarter got recalled for Korea; he is in the middle of the attached photo.

Bob, Dad & Mel  1950.jpg

IMG_4873.JPG

IMG_4874.JPG

IMG_4879.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

The affidavit confirming the "ownership"  of the T99 by Carter's captain, assumed his captain, is extremely unusual. Note, he is only verifying that Carter is the "owner" of the contents of the box and NOT authorizing his possession. At that time, the War Department had issued a directive that MGs were not eligible to be authorized by their CO as "war trophies" through issuing a circular with all pertinent info,  due to the US 1934 NFA requiring registration of MGs. 
Many MGs were properly imported as there were no restrictions on importation into the U.S. of an MG by an individual. Of, course, many were brought back anyway. 
To date, and this has been confirmed by a friend who was a 25 year employee of ATF/NFA in many capacities and also an MG collector, no war trophy circulars have ever been used to register an unregistered MG. That is also my experience after close to fifty years immersed in all aspects of MG possession and collecting, licensed 07 gun smithing and especially helping those who have "unregistered", (no paperwork) MGs. Of the many, many "unregistered" MGs about which I have been informed and assisted, only three have had documented association with "federal" possession which was valid for registration. Others often had various documentation of sorts claiming bringback origin but none sufficient to take to ATF. Not a single actual War Dept circular for an MG. 
There are many circulars in collections, etc authorizing bringback of all sorts of other trophies. FWIW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...