Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

1936 Manual


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 full auto 45

full auto 45

    Respected Member

  • Board Benefactor
  • 4555 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Looking over your shoulder right now
  • Interests:Thompson's, Any Machinegun, Harley's and scuba diving. In that order.

Posted 26 October 2005 - 06:55 PM

1936 manual copy

Saw this today and after looking at it close, it's a copy. The trigger doesn't meet the ring. Somebody got one on him.
Or am I wrong? dry.gif
  • 0

#2 1921A

1921A

    Respected Member

  • Board Benefactor
  • 531 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 26 October 2005 - 07:10 PM

Hi Mike:

You're right - it's a reprint. Sorry I missed your October shoot. Let me know about the spring shoot and I'll try to make it. Missed you at KCR - hope to see you there in April.

Greg Fox
  • 0

#3 dalbert

dalbert

    Website Owner

  • Admin
  • 4269 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 26 October 2005 - 07:23 PM

Mike,

Instead of saying "THIS IS NOT A REPRODUCTION, " the ad should state "THIS IS DEFINITELY A REPRODUCTION."

David
  • 0

#4 JimFromFL

JimFromFL

    Long Time RKI Member

  • Regular Group
  • 1877 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Florida

Posted 26 October 2005 - 07:57 PM

Half temped to bid $200 to win the auction then tell him afterwards that I am not paying because its a reproduction and he used false advertising. cool.gif

  • 0

#5 full auto 45

full auto 45

    Respected Member

  • Board Benefactor
  • 4555 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Looking over your shoulder right now
  • Interests:Thompson's, Any Machinegun, Harley's and scuba diving. In that order.

Posted 26 October 2005 - 10:09 PM

I was tempted to email the dude , but thought it just ain't worth the 'slplainin' to do it.
  • 0

#6 Merry Ploughboy

Merry Ploughboy

    Long Time RKI Member

  • Regular Group
  • 888 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 28 October 2005 - 10:05 AM

Well, the seller may be right. Not a reproduction, as a "reproduction" may imply to some an accurate copy of an original as would be made by a high quality color copier. This is more like an inaccurate new printing which copies many features of the original document.
  • 0

#7 Arthur Fliegenheimer

Arthur Fliegenheimer

    Respected Member

  • Regular Group
  • 3453 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 28 October 2005 - 10:31 AM

Even the original version could only muster $100 on ebay and this guy wants to start $25 over that already inflated figure.
  • 0