Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Colt Thompson Examined


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 Tman

Tman

    Respected Member

  • Board Benefactor
  • 488 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX
  • Interests:Firearms, in general

Posted 15 March 2006 - 06:40 PM

Folks,
I just got back from taking a new employee to the Harris County (Houston, TX) Crime Lab. While there we asked for the nickel tour of their operation and were shown around the place. Our host took us to their evidence room and let us take a look at some of their exemplars. Lo and behold, what do I spy? A Thompson that I first took as a Spitfire or some other knockoff. When I picked it up and looked at the left side I about fell over. I was holding the worst looking Colt Thompson I had ever seen. It had no butt stock and the finish consisted of flat black spray paint over the badly worn bluing. I asked if I could take it apart to get a better look and here's what I found.

Model of 1921
Serial number 5187
Nickel bolt
Nickel insides
Flat ejector
No hole in the mag release
Checkered/knurled selectors with a hole in the safe/fire
Knurled actuator
No comp
Lower and upper s/n match
Lyman sight

No other markings anywhere that I could see. I am going to run a check to see if it is on paper. The lab techs were getting ready to leave so I couldn't get any pics but will go back and get some at a later date.
  • 0

#2 dalbert

dalbert

    Website Owner

  • Admin
  • 4269 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 15 March 2006 - 06:54 PM

Tman,

That would be a new one for Gordon's book.

David Albert
dalbert@sturmgewehr.com
  • 0

#3 Arthur Fliegenheimer

Arthur Fliegenheimer

    Respected Member

  • Regular Group
  • 3453 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 15 March 2006 - 07:02 PM

Greg,
Nice job! That serial # was MIA since leaving Colt. Do you know what crime this TSMG was involved in and when?

  • 0

#4 Tman

Tman

    Respected Member

  • Board Benefactor
  • 488 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX
  • Interests:Firearms, in general

Posted 16 March 2006 - 10:38 AM

The staff is pretty new over there so I doubt that anyone knows how long its been there or under what circumstances it became the property of the county. I'll do some asking next time I'm over there.


  • 0

#5 full auto 45

full auto 45

    Respected Member

  • Board Benefactor
  • 4555 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Looking over your shoulder right now
  • Interests:Thompson's, Any Machinegun, Harley's and scuba diving. In that order.

Posted 16 March 2006 - 11:18 AM

Find out if it is registered or not.
  • 0

#6 Tman

Tman

    Respected Member

  • Board Benefactor
  • 488 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX
  • Interests:Firearms, in general

Posted 16 March 2006 - 04:04 PM

Waiting on the reply as I write this. Maybe tomorrow.
  • 0

#7 TheGunny

TheGunny

    Regular Member

  • Regular Group
  • 120 posts

Posted 16 March 2006 - 04:32 PM

That will be some interesting photos to see!

Watch this gun be a registered gun that was stolen in the 70's and just now turned up! Probably some old guy that passed away and when they try to return it to the wife, she'll be some lib-tard who'll want it melted! dry.gif
  • 0

#8 Motorcar

Motorcar

    Long Time RKI Member

  • Board Benefactor
  • 601 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 16 March 2006 - 05:48 PM

You always find the cool stuff Greg! I bet PK could make her pretty again hail.gif I'll take it if you don't want to bother waiting to have it restored biggrin.gif
  • 0

#9 Tman

Tman

    Respected Member

  • Board Benefactor
  • 488 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX
  • Interests:Firearms, in general

Posted 17 March 2006 - 10:23 AM

The results are in and it show that it is on paper but it was registered on a Form 10. sad.gif

Research will continue and will be reported via this forum.
  • 0

#10 Chopper28

Chopper28

    Long Time RKI Member

  • Board Donor
  • 698 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Class III stuff and Harleys

Posted 17 March 2006 - 10:35 AM

Form 10 should be used for toilet paper!!!!
  • 0